Observed topology
AS8540 AMANET-AS AMA netwoRX GmbH
Unclassified RIPE
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS8540: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 646 |
| AS1299 | Arelion Sweden AB | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 67 |
| AS2914 | NTT America, Inc. | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 66 |
| AS9002 | RETN Limited | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 58 |
| AS174 | Cogent Communications, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 51 |
| AS34549 | meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 51 |
| AS3356 | Level 3 Parent, LLC | Transit | IPv4 | 48 |
| AS33891 | Core-Backbone GmbH | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 21 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 19 |
| AS48362 | Stadtwerke Feldkirch | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 19 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS8540 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS39912 | oja.at GmbH | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 2,374 |
| AS35579 | Aktiengesellschaft | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,235 |
| AS60587 | XINON GmbH | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 490 |
| AS12453 | KraftCom Service GmbH | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 459 |
| AS205584 | CASHPOINT Solutions GmbH | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 287 |
| AS212131 | PSMEDIA LTD&CoKG | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 112 |
| AS212640 | neo-it GmbH | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 104 |
| AS35492 | Verein zur Foerderung freier Netze | Unclassified | IPv4 | 96 |
| AS205629 | AMA netwoRX GmbH | Unclassified | IPv4 | 66 |
| AS41905 | oja.at GmbH | Unclassified | IPv4 | 57 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS8540 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 6,018 |
| AS60587 | XINON GmbH | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 3,283 |
| AS39912 | oja.at GmbH | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 2,875 |
| AS35579 | Aktiengesellschaft | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,387 |
| AS1299 | Arelion Sweden AB | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 575 |
| AS12453 | KraftCom Service GmbH | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 535 |
| AS9002 | RETN Limited | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 534 |
| AS2914 | NTT America, Inc. | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 525 |
| AS174 | Cogent Communications, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 502 |
| AS3356 | Level 3 Parent, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 458 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-11-04 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 76 BGP vantage points across 74.33M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.