asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9002 RETN-AS

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 24.32K 21 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly GB
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

RETN Limited

Global · AI-generated

transit backbone legacy

RETN-AS is RETN Limited, a large independent international transit carrier operating a backbone across Europe, the CIS, the Caucasus, Central Asia and onward to Asia and North America.

What it's used for

Wholesale IP transit, wavelength and Ethernet services. The role is unmistakable in the routing data: only ~41k addresses of directly announced IPv4 space but ~3,168 observed BGP neighbours, the signature of a carrier whose value is interconnection rather than address holdings. Under the neighbour-count-beats-address-count rule this is a transit backbone, not an eyeball or hosting network.

Notable

The announced prefixes are a scatter of small blocks (many /24s and a few /22/19s) drawn from ranges RETN carries for customers. Sampled reverse DNS on several of them resolves to rt01.beget.ru-style router names, i.e. downstream customer infrastructure (Beget, a Russian host), riding RETN transit rather than RETN's own eyeball space.

Interesting

RETN is one of the more prominent independent (non-incumbent) carriers bridging Western Europe and the former-Soviet region, widely present at European internet exchanges.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Address space

Summary

Full explorer
CountryNamePrefixes
GBUnited Kingdom22

Registry

Allocation record

via RIPE RDAP
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS9002
Registry name
RETN-AS
Registrant
MNT-RETN
Abuse contact
abuse@retn.net
Registered
2008-03-25
Last changed
2026-08-07
Status
active

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check