asn.dev

Observed topology

AS56654 AS56654 - Infinity Telecom SRL

Upstreams 30 carry this network
Downstreams 1 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 26
Adjacent (IPv6) 18

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS56654: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4135
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv692
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv692
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv454
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv628
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv619
AS208972GIBIRNET ILETISIM HIZMETLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETIUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv610
AS8280SYNAPSECOM S.A. Provider of Telecommunications and Internet ServicesHostingIPv4 IPv610
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv610
AS20766Association "Gitoyen"UnclassifiedIPv49
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv49
AS206499LOCIX LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv49
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv49
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv49
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv49
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv49
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv49
AS293ESnetUnclassifiedIPv49
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv49
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv62
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv61
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv61
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv61
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv61
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv61

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS56654 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS48948ENERGY DOT SRLUnclassifiedIPv454

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

44 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS56654 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4135
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv692
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv692
AS48948ENERGY DOT SRLUnclassifiedIPv463
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv454
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv429
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv628
AS208972GIBIRNET ILETISIM HIZMETLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETIUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv621
AS8280SYNAPSECOM S.A. Provider of Telecommunications and Internet ServicesHostingIPv4 IPv621
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv420
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv619
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv611
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv610
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv610
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv49
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv49
AS293ESnetUnclassifiedIPv49
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv49
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv49
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv49
AS206499LOCIX LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv49
AS20766Association "Gitoyen"UnclassifiedIPv49
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv62
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv61
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv61
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv61
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS56654, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 5 exchanges across 4 countries and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.194.1701,073
AMS-IX AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands80.249.208.158894
NetIXSofia, Bulgaria185.1.227.2264
InterLAN-IXBucharest, Romania86.104.125.210151
Bulgarian Internet eXchangeSofia, Bulgaria193.169.199.127137

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.