asn.dev

Observed topology

AS28919 STWKUFSTEIN-AS Fischergries 2

Upstreams 22 carry this network
Downstreams 1 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 19
Adjacent (IPv6) 12

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS28919: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS21013eww agUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6775
AS8412T-Mobile Austria GmbHResidentialIPv4 IPv6185
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4130
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv684
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv624
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv624
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv624
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv624
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv420
AS3303Swisscom (Schweiz) AGResidentialIPv420
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv420
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv420
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv420
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv614
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv49
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv68
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv64
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv64
AS3204xTom OUHostingIPv62
AS12859BIT BVHostingIPv41
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv41
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv41

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS28919 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS199931Kommunalbetriebe Hopfgarten GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4324

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

31 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS28919 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS21013eww agUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6985
AS199931Kommunalbetriebe Hopfgarten GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4324
AS8412T-Mobile Austria GmbHResidentialIPv4 IPv6185
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4172
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv6102
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv630
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv630
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv426
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv426
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv426
AS3303Swisscom (Schweiz) AGResidentialIPv426
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv426
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv624
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv624
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv620
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv415
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv68
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv64
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv64
AS3204xTom OUHostingIPv62
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv41
AS12859BIT BVHostingIPv41
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS28919, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 2 exchanges across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.195.1361,073
DE-CIX MunichMunich, Germany185.1.208.97207

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.