asn.dev

Observed topology

AS199938 NETZWERGE

Upstreams 26 carry this network
Downstreams 5 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 26
Adjacent (IPv6) 18

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS199938: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv689
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv681
AS201709HanDS Hanse Datacenter Services GmbHHostingIPv472
AS15943wilhelm.tel GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv662
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv620
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv68
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv68
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv68
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv68
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv68
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv68
AS34800Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv46
AS20766Association "Gitoyen"UnclassifiedIPv46
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv46
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv46
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv46
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv46
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv46
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv46
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv46
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv46
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv46
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv64
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv62
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv62
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv62

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS199938 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS201609Gummi Ehlers GmbH trading as ELAFLEX HIBY GmbH & Co. KGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv682
AS203536FNOH DSL Suedheide GmbHResidentialIPv478
AS201709HanDS Hanse Datacenter Services GmbHHostingIPv4 IPv625
AS49009Freifunk Rheinland e.V.UnclassifiedIPv44
AS200258Mike BressemUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

45 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS199938 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS201709HanDS Hanse Datacenter Services GmbHHostingIPv4 IPv6162
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6132
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv692
AS201609Gummi Ehlers GmbH trading as ELAFLEX HIBY GmbH & Co. KGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv682
AS203536FNOH DSL Suedheide GmbHResidentialIPv478
AS15943wilhelm.tel GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv672
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv624
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv413
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv413
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv412
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv612
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv611
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv610
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv610
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv69
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv68
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv68
AS34800Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv47
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv47
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv47
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv47
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv47
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv47
AS20766Association "Gitoyen"UnclassifiedIPv47
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv46
AS49009Freifunk Rheinland e.V.UnclassifiedIPv44
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv64
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv63
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv63
AS200258Mike BressemUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS199938, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 6 exchanges across 2 countries and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.193.2481,073
AMS-IX AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands80.249.211.237893
DE-CIX DusseldorfDüsseldorf, Germany185.1.170.79225
DE-CIX MunichMunich, Germany185.1.208.87207
DE-CIX HamburgHamburg, Germany185.1.210.92195
Megaport Hamburg IXHamburg, Germany193.42.155.4962

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.