asn.dev

Observed topology

AS199775 CONNEXIN-LIMITED

Upstreams 20 carry this network
Downstreams 0 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 20
Adjacent (IPv6) 0

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS199775: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4294
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4131
AS3257GTT Communications Inc.TransitIPv476
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv436
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv418
AS50304Blix Solutions ASUnclassifiedIPv418
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv412
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv412
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv412
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv412
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv412
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv412
AS3741Dimension DataUnclassifiedIPv412
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv412
AS8218Zayo Infrastructure France SAUnclassifiedIPv412
AS7575Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet)EducationIPv412
AS20562Broadband Hosting B.V.HostingIPv411
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv49
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv49
AS3216PJSC "Vimpelcom"MobileIPv49

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS199775 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

No downstream observed. This network does not appear to carry transit for anyone.

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

20 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS199775 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4294
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4131
AS3257GTT Communications Inc.TransitIPv476
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv436
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv418
AS50304Blix Solutions ASUnclassifiedIPv418
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv412
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv412
AS3741Dimension DataUnclassifiedIPv412
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv412
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv412
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv412
AS7575Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet)EducationIPv412
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv412
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv412
AS8218Zayo Infrastructure France SAUnclassifiedIPv412
AS20562Broadband Hosting B.V.HostingIPv411
AS3216PJSC "Vimpelcom"MobileIPv49
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv49
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv49

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS199775, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 4 exchanges across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
LINX LON1London, United Kingdom195.66.225.117925
London Network Access PointLondon, United Kingdom5.57.82.130316
LINX ManchesterManchester, United Kingdom195.66.244.16145
Leeds Internet ExchangeLeeds, United Kingdom91.217.231.3322

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.