Autonomous system
AS12301 Invitech One Hungary Ltd.
Unclassified RIPE NSP
Summary
Invitech
isp telecom hosting legacy
Invitech is a Hungarian telecommunications and IT services operator, descended from the fixed-line company Deltav and later known as Invitel.
What it's used for
- Broadband, business connectivity and managed IT services across Hungary. Sampled addresses answer under
pool.invitel.hu, the subscriber pool of the operator's previous brand.
Notable
- 256 IPv4 prefixes for 317,000 addresses, with 165 observed BGP neighbours. Both numbers are large for a national market Hungary's size, and together they describe an incumbent fixed-line carrier: a lot of subscriber space and a lot of interconnection.
- Almost every block carries a
HU-DELTAV-netname with the assignment date encoded, and the series runs from990318through20000107,20001020,20060727and20070705. The company's growth is dated block by block across a decade. - One
/20is registered to Kapos-NET Kft., a separate Hungarian operator, and announced here alongside the rest.
Interesting
DELTAVnames a company that stopped existing twice over — first when it became Invitel, then again when Invitel's consumer business was sold and the remainder renamed Invitech. Every one of those blocks has been through two rebrands without ever being renumbered, and the reverse DNS is still on the middle name.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 2 exchanges in 2 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| DE-CIX Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 80.81.192.70 |
| Budapest Internet Exchange | Budapest, Hungary | 193.188.137.42 |
Transit providers
21 upstream, 47 downstream and 85 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-11-04, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 257 prefixes · 316K addresses IPv6 22 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| HU | Hungary | 279 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS12301- Registry name
- Invitech
- Registrant
- ONE-HU-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse.hu@one.hu
- Registered
- 2002-09-11
- Last changed
- 2026-10-01
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- One Hungary Ltd._12301
- Also known as
- Invitech (Fibernet, PanTel, Hungarotel, Euroweb, Novacom, Elender, Digitel2002, Vivendi, Deltav)
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- Regional
- Traffic ratio
- Mostly Inbound
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
RIPE::AS12301:AS-ROUTES- Present at
- 2 exchanges
- Facilities
- 7 facilities
- Website
- https://www.one.hu/kozep-nagyvallalatok
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 92% valid · 178 valid, 16 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 168 authorising AS12301
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 194 of 194 announcements
- Route objects
- 213 naming AS12301
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 453 networks and 1,853 prefixes, as published 2026-11-05. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere