Autonomous system
AS8422 NETCOLOGNE
Residential APNIC
Summary
NetCologne
isp residential legacy
NETCOLOGNE is NetCologne GmbH, the city carrier of Cologne and the
surrounding Rhineland. It is one of Germany's largest municipal-utility-backed
telecoms, running its own fibre, cable and DSL access network rather than reselling
Deutsche Telekom's.
What it's used for
- Residential broadband and telephony across Cologne, Bonn, Leverkusen and the Rhine-Erft area, plus business connectivity and services for the region's schools and public bodies.
- The reverse DNS is decisive: subscriber addresses resolve as
cable-IP-ADDR.nc.deandxdsl-IP-ADDR.nc.deacross the big78.34.0.0/15,87.78.0.0/15and89.0.0.0/15blocks.
Notable
- A genuine eyeball network of roughly 570,000 IPv4 addresses, with heavy IPv6 deployment alongside it. Addresses here overwhelmingly front households in one German metropolitan region, so they geolocate tightly to Cologne.
- Its peering footprint is unusually large for a regional carrier: it is a long-standing presence at DE-CIX and neighbouring exchanges, which is how a city network keeps local traffic local.
Interesting
- NetCologne grew out of the city's public utility company, a distinctly German model in which the municipal power and water provider also lays the fibre. That is why an operator this size exists at all in a market otherwise dominated by national incumbents.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| DE | Germany | 52 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS8422- Registry name
- NETCOLOGNE
- Registrant
- NETCOLOGNE-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@netcologne.de
- Registered
- 2002-09-24
- Last changed
- 2026-07-28
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere