asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS7670 CTNET Enecom,Inc.

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 135K 19 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly JP
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Enecom, Inc.

Japan · AI-generated

isp residential eyeball legacy

CTNET is Enecom, Inc., the telecoms and systems subsidiary of the Chugoku Electric Power group, covering the Chugoku region of western Japan (Hiroshima, Okayama, Shimane, Tottori, Yamaguchi). The handle preserves its founding name, Chugoku Telecommunication Network, from 1992.

What it's used for

  • About 135,000 addresses across nineteen prefixes, plus 2001:2a8::/32. Enecom sells the MEGA EGG consumer fibre service and also resells access over NTT's FLET'S plant.
  • Reverse DNS is dominated by sequentially numbered subscriber pools on regional ISP and cable-TV brands the company serves: mysNNNNNNNNNNNN.pionet.ne.jp, NNN-NN-NNN-N.okuizumo.ne.jp, NNNNNN.torichu.ne.jp. That is access-network addressing, not backbone or hosting.

Notable

  • An eyeball network. A useful detail for geolocation: much of the space sits behind small local operators — municipal and community cable-TV internet services in the Chugoku prefectures — for whom Enecom supplies the addresses and the upstream. The user is a household in rural Shimane or Tottori, even where the AS name says "electric power company".

Interesting

  • Enecom reached its present shape by absorption: the 1992 leased-line carrier merged with a Chugoku Electric IT services firm in 2003, and it also inherited the customer base of Urban Internet, an independent ISP from the dial-up era.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Address space

Summary

Full explorer
CountryNamePrefixes
JPJapan20

Registry

Allocation record

via ARIN RDAP
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS7670
Registry name
CTNET
Last changed
2024-01-22
Status
active

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check