asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS60806 ZICOMNEXT

Unclassified RIPE Cable/DSL/ISP

IPv4 addresses 36.86K 10 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly PL
Exchanges 2 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 5 1 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Zicom

Poland · AI-generated

residential isp cable dsl

The AS handle ZICOMNEXT is held by Zicom Next Sp. z o.o., a Polish telecommunications operator based in Tarnów.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries residential and business access traffic, evidenced by reverse DNS entries such as in.net.pl and static.system77.pl, alongside netnames like PL-ZICOMNEXTTARNOW and PL-ZETOSA.
  • The AS announces 36,864 IPv4 addresses across 10 prefixes and maintains 14 observed neighbours, a ratio consistent with an access network providing last-mile connectivity rather than transit.
  • Traffic from this AS consists of subscriber eyeballs and static IP endpoints for local businesses, reflecting Zicom's role as a regional cable and DSL provider.

Notable

  • Registrants are split between "ZICOM NEXT" SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA and ZESPOL EFEKTYWNYCH TECHNIK OBLICZENIOWYCH S.A. (ZETOSA), indicating a consolidation of address space from a predecessor or partner entity.
  • The inventory includes a mix of /20, /21, and /22 blocks, with the largest being 85.28.128.0/18, which is registered to ZETOSA.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 2 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
TPIX - Internet ExchangeWarsaw, Poland195.149.233.190
Equinix Internet Exchange WarsawWarsaw, Poland195.182.219.21

Transit providers

5 upstream, 1 downstream and 6 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS9002RETN Limited425
AS5617Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna380
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC192
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbH34
AS24482SG.GS18

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 10 prefixes · 36.86K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
PLPoland10

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS60806
Registry name
ZICOMNEXT
Registrant
MNT-ZICOMNEXT
Abuse contact
lir@zicom.pl
Registered
2013-05-08
Last changed
2021-12-27
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
ZICOM
Also known as
ZICOM
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Not Disclosed
Traffic ratio
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-ZICOM
Present at
3 exchanges
Website
https://zicom.pl

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 18 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS60806
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 18 of 18 announcements
Route objects
20 naming AS60806

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check