asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS60764 TK-TELECOM

Unclassified RIPE NSP

IPv4 addresses 2.05K 2 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 2 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly RU
Exchanges 2 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 13 14 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Telecom Samara

Russian Federation · AI-generated

residential isp russia xdsl

TK-TELECOM is operated by Telecom Samara LLC.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries residential broadband access, evidenced by the reverse DNS record 86-62-13-0-nat-pool.ppp.tcsmr.ru and netnames RU-TELECOMSAMARA-20181119 and RU-TELECOMSAMARA-20161025.
  • The AS announces 2048 IPv4 addresses across 2 prefixes and 2 IPv6 prefixes, while maintaining 57 observed neighbours; this ratio of limited address space against a high neighbour count indicates a transit or peering-heavy role for a regional provider.
  • Traffic from this network consists of subscriber eyeballs using xDSL connections, consistent with the operator's business as a local internet service provider in Samara.

Notable

  • Registrants for both announced IPv4 prefixes are listed as Telecom Samara LLC, matching the AS holder.
  • The address inventory is compact, consisting of two /22 IPv4 blocks and two large IPv6 allocations, typical of a regional ISP managing a specific geographic footprint.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 2 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
MSK-IX MoscowMoscow, Russia195.208.208.108
MSK-IX SamaraSamara, Russia193.232.135.51

Transit providers

13 upstream, 14 downstream and 39 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS12389PJSC Rostelecom219
AS9002RETN Limited111
AS50509Transroute Telecom LTD80
AS31500Global Network Management Inc50
AS31133PJSC MegaFon33
AS43727JSC KVANT-TELEKOM33
AS3216PJSC "Vimpelcom"28
AS57304JSC "RetnNet"17

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 2 prefixes · 2.05K addresses IPv6 2 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
RURussian Federation4

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS60764
Registry name
TK-Telecom
Registrant
mnt-ru-telecomsamara-1
Abuse contact
abuse@tcsmr.ru
Registered
2013-05-16
Last changed
2026-02-10
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
Telecom Samara
Also known as
Телеком Самара, ООО
Network type
NSP
Scope
Europe
Traffic ratio
Mostly Inbound
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-TKTEL
Present at
6 exchanges
Website
http://tcsmr.ru/

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 11 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
12 authorising AS60764
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 11 of 11 announcements
Route objects
11 naming AS60764

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 440 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check