asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS5459 LINX-AS London interconnection point

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 3.07K 3 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 16 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly GB
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

London Internet Exchange (LINX)

United Kingdom · AI-generated

ixp network legacy

LINX-AS, described in the registry simply as the London interconnection point

the London Internet Exchange, one of the largest and oldest internet exchange

points in the world.

What it's used for

  • LINX's own infrastructure and services as an exchange operator: the address space underpinning its peering fabric and the systems that run it.

Notable

  • An IXP's ASN is not a transit network. Members exchange traffic directly with each other over the exchange fabric, each under its own AS number; LINX itself is the venue, not a hop in the path. LINX's route servers, which do mediate peering between members, run under a separate ASN.
  • LINX was founded in the mid-1990s by a handful of UK ISPs who wanted to keep domestic traffic in the country instead of hauling it across the Atlantic and back. The low AS number dates from that period.

Interesting

  • The "keep local traffic local" argument that started LINX is the same one every IXP has made since. It is why an AS number attached to a building full of cross-connects ended up among the most consequential on the list.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Address space

Summary

Full explorer
CountryNamePrefixes
GBUnited Kingdom19

Registry

Allocation record

via RIPE RDAP
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS5459
Registry name
LINX-AS
Registrant
AS5459-MNT
Abuse contact
support@linx.net
Registered
2002-09-02
Last changed
2025-07-28
Status
active

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check