asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS51904 UTEX-AS

Residential RIPE Cable/DSL/ISP

IPv4 addresses 2.05K 2 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly RU
Exchanges 1 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 8 1 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Utex-Telecom

Russian Federation · AI-generated

isp residential cable russia

UTEX-AS is operated by Utex-Telecom LLC (also known as Utex.Net), a regional cable and DSL internet service provider in Russia.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries residential subscriber traffic, evidenced by reverse DNS entries pointing to utex-telecom.ru and netnames RU-SHCHUROV and RU-SHCHUROV-20181219 registered to Mikhail Yurievich Shchurov.
  • The AS announces 2048 IPv4 addresses across 2 prefixes (91.132.104.0/22 and 193.41.76.0/22) and maintains 20 observed neighbours, a ratio consistent with an access network providing last-mile connectivity rather than transit.
  • Traffic from this AS consists of subscriber eyeballs accessing the internet via cable or DSL connections in the Moscow region.

Notable

  • Registrants for both announced prefixes are Mikhail Yurievich Shchurov, aligning with the AS holder and the operator's identity as a small, owner-operated ISP.
  • The address inventory is compact, consisting of two /22 blocks, which is typical for a regional ISP serving a specific local area.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
MSK-IX MoscowMoscow, Russia195.208.208.241

Transit providers

8 upstream, 1 downstream and 12 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS8641LLC "Nauka-Svyaz"76
AS9002RETN Limited20
AS57304JSC "RetnNet"12
AS35598INETCOM CARRIER LLC10
AS24482SG.GS2
AS37721Virtual Technologies & Solutions2
AS49673Truenetwork LLC2
AS62255BiMajLink d.o.o.2

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-16, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 2 prefixes · 2.05K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
RURussian Federation2

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS51904
Registry name
UTEX-AS
Registrant
lir-ru-shchurov-1-MNT
Abuse contact
antonio@utex.net
Registered
2010-11-26
Last changed
2026-05-19
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
Utex-Telecom LLC
Also known as
Utex.Net
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Regional
Traffic ratio
Mostly Inbound
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-UTEX
Present at
8 exchanges
Facilities
1 facilities
Website
http://utex.net/

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 2 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS51904
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 2 of 2 announcements
Route objects
2 naming AS51904

Reputation

Classification and threat

Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,783 prefixes, as published 2026-10-17. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check