Autonomous system
AS48314 IP-PROJECTS
Unclassified RIPE NSP
Summary
IP-Projects
hosting isp business germany
IP-PROJECTS is operated by IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG.
What it's used for
- The address space carries hosting and business infrastructure, evidenced by reverse DNS entries such as
fra1-212754-fw-gw-2.business-rootserver.netandbackup-vlan733-extern-1.ip-projects.de, alongside netnames likeDE-IP-PROJECTS-20190328. - The AS announces 34,816 IPv4 addresses across 74 prefixes and 25 IPv6 prefixes, while maintaining 151 observed neighbours; this ratio of moderate address inventory against a high neighbour count indicates a transit and hosting provider role rather than a pure access network.
- Traffic from this AS consists of web servers, virtual servers, and cloud infrastructure services, consistent with the operator's business model of providing individual hosting solutions and server operations.
Notable
- Registrants largely align with the announcer, with most prefixes registered to Michael Sebastian Schinzel trading as IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG, though some blocks are registered to third parties such as COSIMO Vertriebs und Beratungs GmbH and GWY IT PTY LTD.
- The address inventory is fragmented across numerous /22 and /23 blocks, including ranges from 5.180.64.0/22 to 193.238.88.0/22, reflecting a diverse portfolio of acquired or allocated space.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 4 exchanges in 2 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| DE-CIX Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 80.81.194.175 |
| AMS-IX Amsterdam | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 80.249.213.119 |
| Local Internet Exchange Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 185.1.167.180 |
| ERA-IX Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 185.0.27.85 |
Transit providers
30 upstream, 20 downstream and 87 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 74 prefixes · 34.82K addresses IPv6 25 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| DE | Germany | 99 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS48314- Registry name
- IP-PROJECTS
- Registrant
- de-ip-projects-1-mnt
- Abuse contact
- abuse@ip-projects.de
- Registered
- 2020-05-19
- Last changed
- 2025-07-20
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG
- Also known as
- IPP
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- Europe
- Traffic ratio
- Balanced
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-IP-PROJECTS- Present at
- 4 exchanges
- Facilities
- 5 facilities
- Website
- https://www.ip-projects.de/
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 98% valid · 132 valid, 3 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 139 authorising AS48314
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 135 of 135 announcements
- Route objects
- 171 naming AS48314
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 432 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere