Observed topology
AS42927 S-NET-AS S-NET Sp. z o.o.
Unclassified RIPE
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS42927: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS9002 | RETN Limited | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 900 |
| AS3356 | Level 3 Parent, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 892 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 291 |
| AS201054 | Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 38 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 34 |
| AS29632 | Netassist International EOOD | Unclassified | IPv6 | 6 |
| AS24115 | Equinix | Hosting | IPv4 | 2 |
| AS5617 | Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna | Mobile | IPv4 | 1 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS42927 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS41931 | EURONET NORBERT SANIEWSKI SPOLKA JAWNA | Residential | IPv4 | 207 |
| AS15541 | Marcin Bochenek trading as CETI s.c. | Hosting | IPv4 | 165 |
| AS57608 | FIBO SA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 109 |
| AS197113 | MAGDALENA ZANETA MARCZUK trading as LCS SYSTEMY TELEINFORMATYCZNE | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 103 |
| AS35174 | Network For Business Sp z o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 94 |
| AS204841 | AVSystem sp. z o. o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 90 |
| AS199409 | FarmaProm Polska Sp. z o.o. Sp. K | Unclassified | IPv4 | 84 |
| AS48487 | LoVo Sp. z o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 68 |
| AS43472 | HostingMax LTD | Unclassified | IPv4 | 61 |
| AS203066 | Aporia Rafal Kaczmarczyk | Unclassified | IPv4 | 61 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS42927 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 | Level 3 Parent, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,634 |
| AS9002 | RETN Limited | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,401 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 530 |
| AS41931 | EURONET NORBERT SANIEWSKI SPOLKA JAWNA | Residential | IPv4 | 207 |
| AS15541 | Marcin Bochenek trading as CETI s.c. | Hosting | IPv4 | 179 |
| AS57608 | FIBO SA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 151 |
| AS197113 | MAGDALENA ZANETA MARCZUK trading as LCS SYSTEMY TELEINFORMATYCZNE | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 103 |
| AS35174 | Network For Business Sp z o.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 94 |
| AS204841 | AVSystem sp. z o. o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 90 |
| AS199409 | FarmaProm Polska Sp. z o.o. Sp. K | Unclassified | IPv4 | 84 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-11-01 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 76 BGP vantage points across 74.48M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.