asn.dev

Observed topology

AS39543 TENNET-AS

Upstreams 8 carry this network
Downstreams 5 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 13
Adjacent (IPv6) 1

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS39543: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS41494Asociatia InterlanUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv61,031
AS8708DIGI ROMANIA S.A.MobileIPv4424
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4279
AS24745Orange Romania S.A.UnclassifiedIPv430
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv430
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv430
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv430
AS6910DIGI ROMANIA S.A.ResidentialIPv49

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS39543 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS41984Confort L&CC SRLUnclassifiedIPv4305
AS60604Primaria Municipiului CalarasiUnclassifiedIPv461
AS30890Tennet Telecom SRLUnclassifiedIPv461
AS41537SC C Solution SRLUnclassifiedIPv431
AS214265Yako Telecom SRLUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

14 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS39543 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS41494Asociatia InterlanUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv61,398
AS8708DIGI ROMANIA S.A.MobileIPv4424
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4343
AS41984Confort L&CC SRLUnclassifiedIPv4305
AS30890Tennet Telecom SRLUnclassifiedIPv461
AS60604Primaria Municipiului CalarasiUnclassifiedIPv461
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv437
AS24745Orange Romania S.A.UnclassifiedIPv437
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv437
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv437
AS41537SC C Solution SRLUnclassifiedIPv431
AS6910DIGI ROMANIA S.A.ResidentialIPv49
AS214265Yako Telecom SRLUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS39543, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
InterLAN-IXBucharest, Romania86.104.125.72151

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.