asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS41494 ASOCIATIA-INTERLAN InterLAN Services

Unclassified ARIN Non-Profit

IPv4 addresses 768 3 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 2 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly RO
Exchanges 2 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 5 18 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Interlan Association

Romania · AI-generated

transit regional non-profit fiber

ASOCIATIA-INTERLAN is held by Asociatia Interlan.

What it's used for

  • The space carries infrastructure for a regional fiber optic association, with netnames RO-INTERLAN-20050418 and INTERLAN-SERVICES registered to the InterLAN Internet Exchange NOC.
  • The AS announces 512 IPv4 addresses across 2 prefixes and 1 IPv6 prefix, while maintaining 44 observed neighbours; this ratio of limited address space to high peering density indicates a transit or peering role rather than an access network.
  • Traffic from this AS consists of backbone and interconnection traffic for the Romanian fiber optic infrastructure managed by the association.

Notable

  • Registrants align with the announcer, listing InterLAN Internet Exchange NOC and Asociatia Interlan for both announced IPv4 blocks.
  • The address inventory is compact, consisting of two /24 IPv4 blocks and a single /48 IPv6 block, consistent with a specialized infrastructure provider rather than a mass-market ISP.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 2 exchanges in 2 countries, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
InterLAN-IXBucharest, Romania86.104.125.240
Serbian Open ExchangeBelgrade, Serbia185.1.27.98

Transit providers

5 upstream, 18 downstream and 29 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS6204INTERKVM HOST SRL149
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC51
AS3223Voxility LLP38
AS24482SG.GS5
AS20764CJSC RASCOM3

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-26, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 3 prefixes · 768 addresses IPv6 2 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
RORomania5

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS41494
Registry name
ASOCIATIA-INTERLAN
Registrant
INTERLAN_IEX-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@interlan.ro
Registered
2006-09-01
Last changed
2023-04-14
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
Asociația Interlan
Also known as
Interlan Association
Network type
Non-Profit
Scope
Regional
Traffic ratio
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS41494:AS-INTERLAN-CUSTOM
Present at
1 exchanges
Facilities
3 facilities
Website
https://asociatia.interlan.ro

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
80% valid · 4 valid, 1 with no ROA
ROAs
6 authorising AS41494
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 5 of 5 announcements
Route objects
7 naming AS41494

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 446 networks and 1,852 prefixes, as published 2026-10-27. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check