Autonomous system
AS28663 FLYS INTERATIVA LTDA
Unclassified AFRINIC NSP
Summary
Flys Interativa
isp brazil residential business
The AS handle FLYS INTERATIVA LTDA is held by Flys Interativa.
What it's used for
- The address space carries residential and business internet access, evidenced by the registrant name and the operator's classification as a Network Service Provider (NSP) in South America.
- The AS announces 8,192 IPv4 addresses across 11 prefixes and 26 IPv6 prefixes, while maintaining 187 observed neighbours. This ratio of moderate address space against a high neighbour count suggests a regional access provider with significant peering relationships rather than a pure transit carrier.
Notable
- All RDAP registrants for the announced prefixes are listed as FLYS INTERATIVA LTDA, consistent with the AS holder.
- The address inventory is subdivided into multiple /21, /22, /23, and /24 blocks within the 177.93.0.0/16 and 189.1.0.0/16 ranges, indicating a structured internal allocation for different service segments or regions.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 13 exchanges in 3 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| IX.br (PTT.br) São Paulo | São Paulo, Brazil | 187.16.216.70 |
| DE-CIX Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 80.81.195.129 |
| IX.br (PTT.br) Fortaleza | Fortaleza, Brazil | 45.68.72.243 |
| IX.br (PTT.br) Brasília | Brasília, Brazil | 45.184.144.102 |
| DE-CIX New York | New York, United States | 206.82.104.195 |
| IX.br (PTT.br) Curitiba | Curitiba, Brazil | 45.184.146.77 |
| New York International Internet Exchange | New York, United States | 2001:504:1::a502:8663:1 |
| FL-IX - The Florida Internet Exchange / Community IX - Florida | Miami, United States | 206.41.108.43 |
Transit providers
29 upstream, 16 downstream and 82 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 11 prefixes · 8.19K addresses IPv6 27 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| BR | Brazil | 38 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- AFRINIC
- Handle
28663- Registry name
- ASN28663
- Registrant
- FLYS INTERATIVA LTDA
- Abuse contact
- Grupo de Segurança Durand
- Registered
- 2006-09-11
- Last changed
- 2022-12-01
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- Flys Interativa AS28663
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- South America
- Traffic ratio
- Balanced
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-FLYS- Present at
- 12 exchanges
- Facilities
- 18 facilities
- Website
- http://www.fly.com.br
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 96% valid · 22 valid, 1 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 3 authorising AS28663
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 61% registered · 14 of 23 announcements 1 other origin
- Route objects
- 35 naming AS28663
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere