asn.dev

Observed topology

AS24492 IIT-WICAM-AS-AP WiCAM Corporation Ltd.

Upstreams 19 carry this network
Downstreams 3 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 21
Adjacent (IPv6) 14

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS24492: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv62,315
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4871
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv6361
AS3491PCCW Global (HK) Ltd.TransitIPv4 IPv6259
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6251
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6250
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv6141
AS38001NewMedia Express Pte LtdHostingIPv4 IPv6141
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6141
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv4110
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv4110
AS206499LOCIX LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4110
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4110
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv4110
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv4104
AS52055NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv4101
AS7575Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet)EducationIPv499
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv631
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv631

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS24492 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS137551REDLINK TELECOM Co., LtdUnclassifiedIPv4494
AS139285Wingel cooperation co.,LtdUnclassifiedIPv464
AS24429Zhejiang Taobao Network Co.,LtdHostingIPv634

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

35 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS24492 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv62,436
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6955
AS137551REDLINK TELECOM Co., LtdUnclassifiedIPv4494
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv6381
AS3491PCCW Global (HK) Ltd.TransitIPv4 IPv6311
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6273
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6257
AS38001NewMedia Express Pte LtdHostingIPv4 IPv6174
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv6159
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6152
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6128
AS58453China Mobile International LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4125
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv4121
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv4121
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv4121
AS206499LOCIX LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4120
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv4106
AS7575Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet)EducationIPv4105
AS52055NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv4101
AS139285Wingel cooperation co.,LtdUnclassifiedIPv464
AS24429Zhejiang Taobao Network Co.,LtdHostingIPv634
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv631
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv631
AS35280F5 Networks SARLHostingIPv46
AS61292Blix Group ASUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS24492, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 9 exchanges across 5 countries and 2 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Equinix Internet Exchange SingaporeSingapore, Singapore27.111.230.34490
BroadBand Internet eXchange TokyoTokyo, Japan101.203.90.168359
Hong Kong Internet ExchangeHong Kong, China123.255.90.95307
Singapore Internet ExchangeSingapore, Singapore103.16.102.248273
NetIXSofia, Bulgaria185.1.226.73264
Equinix Internet Exchange Hong KongHong Kong, China2001:de8:7::2:4492:1232
BroadBand Internet eXchange SingaporeSingapore, Singapore103.231.153.7151
BroadBand Internet eXchange Hong KongHong Kong, China103.203.158.67101
Cambodian Network ExchangePhnom Penh, Cambodia103.7.144.4755

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.