asn.dev

Observed topology

AS201986 ARPINET

Upstreams 2 carry this network
Downstreams 11 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 13
Adjacent (IPv6) 4

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS201986: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS8932Ucom CJSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6409
AS12297Telecom Armenia OJSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6302

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS201986 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS200896Arpinet LLCUnclassifiedIPv4250
AS207980TINS LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6222
AS210315Arpinet LLCUnclassifiedIPv4186
AS8226Arpinet LLCUnclassifiedIPv4184
AS205277Interlink LLCUnclassifiedIPv4183
AS207991ACHON LLCUnclassifiedIPv4124
AS197805Dzoraghbyur Complex LLCUnclassifiedIPv462
AS34083Arpinet LLCUnclassifiedIPv462
AS209778Armcom LLCUnclassifiedIPv448
AS214977Artsakhbank CJSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv625
AS211944Narek TadevosyanUnclassifiedIPv410

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

19 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS201986 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS8932Ucom CJSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv61,316
AS12297Telecom Armenia OJSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6916
AS200896Arpinet LLCUnclassifiedIPv4250
AS207980TINS LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6222
AS8226Arpinet LLCUnclassifiedIPv4192
AS210315Arpinet LLCUnclassifiedIPv4186
AS205277Interlink LLCUnclassifiedIPv4183
AS207991ACHON LLCUnclassifiedIPv4124
AS34083Arpinet LLCUnclassifiedIPv462
AS197805Dzoraghbyur Complex LLCUnclassifiedIPv462
AS209778Armcom LLCUnclassifiedIPv448
AS214977Artsakhbank CJSCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv625
AS211944Narek TadevosyanUnclassifiedIPv420

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS201986, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Armenian Internet Traffic ExchangeYerevan, Armenia91.218.7.8121

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.