asn.dev

Observed topology

AS198967 BITEL-GESELLSCHAFT-FUER-TELEKOMMUNIKATION-AS - IP Transit Customer AS33873 -

Upstreams 18 carry this network
Downstreams 7 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 21
Adjacent (IPv6) 16

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS198967: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv4 IPv61,665
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6902
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6651
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv6263
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv672
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv672
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv672
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv670
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv460
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv460
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv460
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv460
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv437
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv624
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv623
AS12466Bicos Computer GmbHUnclassifiedIPv423
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv612
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv612

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS198967 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS207486aov IT.Services GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6370
AS15779Reply S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv4168
AS43155Stadtwerke Bielefeld GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6152
AS12466Bicos Computer GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6134
AS204065OXITGEN AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv655
AS25102CompAct GmbH Computer und KommunikationUnclassifiedIPv453
AS12460mandala IT GmbHUnclassifiedIPv443

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

38 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS198967 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv4 IPv62,164
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv61,119
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6665
AS207486aov IT.Services GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6370
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv4 IPv6334
AS15779Reply S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv4168
AS12466Bicos Computer GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6162
AS43155Stadtwerke Bielefeld GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6152
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv694
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv687
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv482
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv678
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv477
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv477
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv673
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv466
AS204065OXITGEN AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv655
AS25102CompAct GmbH Computer und KommunikationUnclassifiedIPv453
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv652
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv449
AS12460mandala IT GmbHUnclassifiedIPv443
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv633
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv618
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv617

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS198967, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 3 exchanges across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.195.901,073
Megaport Frankfurt IXFrankfurt, Germany62.69.146.27114
Megaport Dusseldorf IXDüsseldorf, Germany194.146.118.2298

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.