Autonomous system
AS15695 EXPEREO
Unclassified APNIC NSP
Summary
Expereo
transit isp hosting business
Sixty-eight IPv4 routes, sixty-seven IPv6 routes, and not one address answers to a name.
What it's used for
- A managed connectivity provider. Sixty-eight IPv4 prefixes and sixty-seven IPv6 prefixes announced from the Netherlands, fifty-six thousand addresses, across two hundred and seventy observed BGP neighbours.
Notable
- The IPv4 and IPv6 route counts are within one of each other, which almost never happens. Most networks of this size carry a fraction of the IPv6 routes they do IPv4.
- One announced block is registered directly to a large multinational corporation rather than to the provider, under a netname that matches nothing else in the record.
- Another belongs to the group's company in a different country, with a short netname of its own.
- The provider's own netnames are a country code, the brand and an allocation date, and a run of them were filed within months of each other in one year.
- One block lists an incident response team object with two initials appended to its name.
- The IPv6 blocks come from a range issued in a different region than the one the holder registers in.
- Eighteen addresses were queried for reverse DNS and none returned a name.
Interesting
- Carrying a customer's own addresses is what a managed provider sells: the customer keeps the block and the provider does the routing, so the record shows one company's name inside another's announcements.
- Two hundred and seventy neighbours across both address families is a network whose product is reaching places, not holding space.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.
Transit providers
76 upstream, 18 downstream and 142 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 70 prefixes · 56.58K addresses IPv6 66 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| NL | Netherlands | 136 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS15695- Registry name
- Expereo
- Registrant
- MNT-EXPEREO
- Abuse contact
- abuse@expereo.com
- Registered
- 2006-09-29
- Last changed
- 2025-11-24
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- Expereo International bv
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- Global
- Traffic ratio
- Balanced
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-EXPEREO- Present at
- 21 exchanges
- Facilities
- 22 facilities
- Website
- http://www.expereo.com
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 78% valid · 216 valid, 60 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 178 authorising AS15695
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 276 of 276 announcements
- Route objects
- 416 naming AS15695
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere