asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS15594 NETZQUADRAT Gladbacherstr. 74

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 24.58K 4 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 3 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly DE
Exchanges 2 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 14 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

netzquadrat

Germany · AI-generated

isp hosting transit business

Ninety-six neighbours on four blocks, and the AS handle ends in a house number.

What it's used for

  • A provider's network. Four IPv4 prefixes and three IPv6 prefixes announced from Germany, twenty-four thousand addresses, across ninety-six observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • The AS handle runs the company name straight into a street name and a house number, so the field that should identify the network gives a postal address instead.
  • All four blocks follow one netname scheme: country code, a two-letter company abbreviation and the allocation date, with dates spread across eight years.
  • The IPv4 holding is two /19 blocks and two /20 blocks, an unusually regular shape for space collected over that long.
  • The three IPv6 prefixes are one /34 and two /36 pieces carved out of it at widely separated offsets.
  • Twelve addresses were queried for reverse DNS and none returned a name.

Interesting

  • Ninety-six neighbours is a peering-heavy network, far more connections than twenty-four thousand addresses would need for their own traffic. The value is in what passes through.
  • A consistent netname scheme across four allocations and eight years means one person's convention outlived several rounds of paperwork, which is rarer in this data than it should be.
  • Announcing two more specific pieces of an IPv6 block alongside the block itself is traffic engineering, and it is still uncommon enough on that protocol to be worth noting.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 2 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.192.75
Megaport Dusseldorf IXDüsseldorf, Germany194.146.118.43

Transit providers

14 upstream, 0 downstream and 22 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS12306Plus.line AG138
AS13237euNetworks GmbH128
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC78
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG24
AS29632Netassist International EOOD12
AS24482SG.GS10
AS34019Hivane Association10
AS48362Stadtwerke Feldkirch10

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-26, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 4 prefixes · 24.58K addresses IPv6 3 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
DEGermany7

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS15594
Registry name
NETZQUADRAT
Registrant
NETZQUADRAT-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@netzquadrat.de
Registered
2002-04-21
Last changed
2024-06-12
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 10 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
13 authorising AS15594
ASPA
5 declared providers
IRR
100% registered · 10 of 10 announcements
Route objects
157 naming AS15594

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 446 networks and 1,852 prefixes, as published 2026-10-27. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check