Observed topology
AS12578 APOLLO-AS SIA Tet
Residential RIPE
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS12578: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 | NTT America, Inc. | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 804 |
| AS1299 | Arelion Sweden AB | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 683 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 416 |
| AS174 | Cogent Communications, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 330 |
| AS34549 | meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 169 |
| AS33891 | Core-Backbone GmbH | Hosting | IPv4 | 60 |
| AS1836 | green.ch AG | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 57 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 57 |
| AS34019 | Hivane Association | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 57 |
| AS37721 | Virtual Technologies & Solutions | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 57 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS12578 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS213934 | IPV1 SIA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 829 |
| AS34073 | LR Izglitibas un zinatnes ministrija | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 496 |
| AS24645 | CSC Telecom, UAB | Residential | IPv4 | 438 |
| AS43513 | Sia Nano IT | Unclassified | IPv4 | 356 |
| AS34326 | CSC Telecom SIA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 295 |
| AS12525 | INTERNET Ltd. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 272 |
| AS8285 | SIA | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 254 |
| AS43188 | Lauku atbalsta dienests | Unclassified | IPv4 | 240 |
| AS6769 | Kertinis valstybes telekomunikaciju centras | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 211 |
| AS197870 | S.I.A."IBANPAY" | Unclassified | IPv4 | 178 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS12578 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 | NTT America, Inc. | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 3,792 |
| AS1299 | Arelion Sweden AB | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 2,421 |
| AS34073 | LR Izglitibas un zinatnes ministrija | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,789 |
| AS8285 | SIA | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,623 |
| AS174 | Cogent Communications, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,605 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,412 |
| AS34549 | meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,061 |
| AS58269 | CloudHosting SIA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 1,046 |
| AS213934 | IPV1 SIA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 829 |
| AS24645 | CSC Telecom, UAB | Residential | IPv4 | 465 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-11-13 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.40M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.