asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9892 ICONZ-WEBVISIONS-AP Iconz-Webvisions Pte. Ltd.

Hosting APNIC

IPv4 addresses 14.08K 18 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 2 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly SG
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 2 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

ICONZ-Webvisions

Singapore · AI-generated

hosting legacy

AS9892 (ICONZ-WEBVISIONS-AP) is held by ICONZ-Webvisions Pte Ltd, a Singapore-registered managed hosting and cloud provider. The company is the product of a 2012 combination of ICONZ and Webvisions, and sells managed hosting, private and public cloud, and colocation to mid-sized enterprises across Asia and Australasia.

What it's used for

This is a hosting network, and the routing evidence carries the usual marks of one. RIS sees 21 IPv4 prefixes carrying 14,080 addresses, 5 IPv6 prefixes (a tidy set of /48s under 2404:4800::), and only 2 observed BGP neighbours. Two upstreams and no downstreams means the AS sells no transit; its address space exists to number servers, not customers' networks. The prefixes are a spread of /21s, /23s and /24s out of several unrelated ranges — 202.157.x, 203.142.x, 123.100.x, 114.129.x — which is what a provider accumulates as it grows a hosting estate and absorbs other businesses, rather than the single clean aggregate an access ISP would receive. Reverse DNS in the sample shows a customer-configured mail host on an organisation's own domain, consistent with hosted and colocated servers rather than an eyeball network.

Notable

  • ICONZ began as a New Zealand internet company and Webvisions as a Singapore hosting one; the surviving entity is Singaporean, so the AS is best read as a Singapore-headquartered provider with a regional footprint rather than a single-country network.
  • Its footprint spans multiple Asian and Australasian markets, so an address in this AS is not reliably in Singapore just because the company is.
  • IPv6 is present and cleanly structured, which is a good sign of an actively managed hosting platform rather than dormant legacy space.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

2 upstream, 0 downstream and 4 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS7473Singapore Telecommunications Ltd727
AS38001NewMedia Express Pte Ltd681

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-16, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 18 prefixes · 14.08K addresses IPv6 2 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
SGSingapore20

Registry

Allocation record

APNIC · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
APNIC
Handle
AS9892
Registry name
ICONZ-WEBVISIONS-AP
Registrant
Iconz-Webvisions Pte. Ltd.
Abuse contact
abuse.sg@iwv.works
Registered
2008-09-04
Last changed
2020-07-29
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 26 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
39 authorising AS9892
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 26 of 26 announcements
Route objects
45 naming AS9892

Reputation

Classification and threat

Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,783 prefixes, as published 2026-10-17. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check