asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS9401 NLC-CN-AS

Unclassified APNIC

IPv4 addresses 0 0 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 0
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 1 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

National Library of China

China · AI-generated

government education legacy

AS9401 (NLC-CN-AS) is registered through APNIC to the National Library of China (中国国家图书馆), the country's national deposit library in Beijing. Its registry record is administered via CERNET, China's national research and education network, which is the usual arrangement for Chinese academic and cultural institutions that hold their own AS number.

What it's used for

Effectively nothing, at present. RIS sees zero announced IPv4 prefixes, zero IPv6 prefixes and no address space originated by this AS at all, with a single BGP adjacency observed. An AS number that exists in the registry but originates no routes is dormant: the institution's public-facing services and staff connectivity reach the internet through address space announced by somebody else — in the Chinese academic context, most commonly a CERNET or carrier-held block — while this number sits reserved but unused in the global table.

That is worth stating plainly because it inverts the usual reading. Anyone geolocating traffic to AS9401 or expecting to find library systems inside it will find nothing, because there is nothing to find in BGP. The AS is a registry artefact, not a live network boundary.

Notable

  • Dormant low-numbered ASNs like this are common: they were allocated when the barrier to getting one was low, and were never retired even after the operator stopped announcing independently.
  • Because no prefix originates here, this ASN cannot meaningfully be classified by address-space behaviour. The identification rests entirely on the registry, not on routing.
  • The registry contact is handled through the Chinese academic network rather than a commercial carrier, which is consistent with the library's status as a state cultural and research institution.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

1 upstream, 0 downstream and 1 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS23911China Next Generation Internet Beijing IX4

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-14, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 0 prefixes · 0 addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

This network announces no prefixes we can see.

Registry

Allocation record

APNIC · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
APNIC
Handle
AS9401
Registry name
NLC-CN-AS
Abuse contact
abuse@cernet.edu.cn
Registered
2008-09-04
Last changed
2020-09-03
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 0 with no ROA 2 RPKI-invalid
ROAs
0 authorising AS9401
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 2 of 2 announcements
Route objects
2 naming AS9401

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,772 prefixes, as published 2026-10-15. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check