Autonomous system
AS9119 SOFTNET-AS Internet Service Provider in Slovenia and South Europe region
Residential RIPE
Summary
SOFTNET d.o.o.
transit isp legacy
SOFTNET-AS (AS9119) is SOFTNET d.o.o., a Slovenian telecommunications provider founded in 1996 and headquartered in Trzin. SoftNET has expanded across South-East Europe with offices in Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, North Macedonia, Bulgaria and Romania.
What it's used for
The AS is a regional carrier: it announces ~75 IPv4 prefixes (~100k addresses) plus IPv6 and shows ~256 observed neighbours, a neighbour count far larger than its address count implies. That, plus presence at multiple exchanges (SIX, CIX, VIX, DE-CIX, HKIX) and hundreds of peering sessions, marks it as a wholesale/transit and business-connectivity carrier rather than a mass-market eyeball ISP. Products include IP transit, IP VPN, MPLS, Ethernet private line and SIP/IP-PBX voice. Sampled rDNS is first-party infrastructure naming (start.softnet.si, sn-...ntwk.softnet.si).
Notable
- The high observed-neighbour count relative to address count is the classic signature of a transit/wholesale carrier.
- Announced from this AS since around 2000; SoftNET operates its own backbone across SEE with a Tier-1 uplink.
Interesting
Despite being a mid-size operator by address count, SoftNET's dense IX presence gives it a connectivity profile closer to a carrier than a retail ISP.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| SI | Slovenia | 31 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS9119- Registry name
- SOFTNET-AS
- Registrant
- AS9119-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@softnet.si
- Registered
- 2002-09-23
- Last changed
- 2025-10-01
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere