Autonomous system
AS8236 DNA-CE
Unclassified RIPE
Summary
DNA Oyj (customer-edge AS)
legacy
DNA-CE belongs to DNA Oyj, the Finnish telecom operator, but the CE is the
important part: this is a customer-edge AS, not DNA's mobile or broadband
network. It exists so that single-homed enterprise customers of DNA can be
announced without each taking their own AS number.
What it's used for
- Announcing address space that belongs to DNA's customers, not to DNA. The prefixes it originates are Provider-Independent assignments registered to unrelated Finnish companies, including a log-house manufacturer and a test-equipment maker.
- The blocks carry no reverse DNS at all, which is normal for small enterprise PI ranges announced through a carrier's shared AS.
Notable
- Do not classify this as mobile or residential. DNA is one of Finland's three big mobile and broadband operators, which makes the eyeball reading feel obvious. It is wrong here: DNA's consumer subscribers live on other ASNs, and this one carries third-party corporate space.
- This is the RFC 2270 shared-customer shape. Geolocating or kind-labelling the AS as a unit is meaningless because each prefix belongs to a different end customer, so it is deliberately left unclassified.
- Tiny inventory, a few small prefixes, and only a handful of BGP neighbours, none of which resembles a national operator's core.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| FI | Finland | 3 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS8236- Registry name
- DNA-CE
- Registrant
- FI2G-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@dnaip.fi
- Registered
- 1970-01-01
- Last changed
- 2017-11-15
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere