Observed topology

AS6458 TELECOMUNICACIONES DE GUATEMALA, SOCIEDAD ANONIMA

Unclassified AFRINIC

Upstreams 0 carry this network

Downstreams 3 this network carries

Adjacent (IPv4) 4

Adjacent (IPv6) 0

Upstream graph Who carries AS6458, and who carries them, drawn as a map up to the transit-free core. 0 exchanges Where AS6458 physically turns up to peer, and its address on each fabric.

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS6458: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

No upstream observed. Typical for a tier-1 network that buys transit from nobody.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS6458 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

AS	Network	Type	Families	Paths seen
AS10586	OSI de Guatemala	Unclassified	IPv4	59
AS27654	Universidad Francisco Marroquin	Unclassified	IPv4	59
AS263714	APICASA S.A. (MEGAPACA)	Unclassified	IPv4	37

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

observed

Every AS seen directly next to AS6458 in a routing path, in either direction.

AS	Network	Type	Families	Paths seen
AS14754	TELECOMUNICACIONES DE GUATEMALA, SOCIEDAD ANONIMA	Unclassified	IPv4	155
AS10586	OSI de Guatemala	Unclassified	IPv4	59
AS27654	Universidad Francisco Marroquin	Unclassified	IPv4	59
AS263714	APICASA S.A. (MEGAPACA)	Unclassified	IPv4	37

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-12 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.21M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.