Autonomous system
AS6205 HIZLINET-TEKNOLOJI HIZLINET TEKNOLOJI A.S.
Hosting RIPE
Summary
HizliNet Teknoloji A.S.
hosting transit legacy
HizliNet-Teknoloji is a Turkish datacentre-connectivity and network provider
based at the ITU Ari Teknokent campus in Sariyer, Istanbul. It markets itself as
a local uplink and colocation provider rather than a consumer ISP.
What it's used for
- Datacentre uplink, colocation, IP transit and DDoS-protected capacity, with presence in Istanbul, Ankara and Izmir and onward reach to Sofia, Frankfurt and Amsterdam.
- Peers and buys transit from the main Turkish and international carriers.
- Announces roughly 8,700 IPv4 addresses, largely as individual
/24s.
Notable
- Reverse DNS on part of the space resolves under
marsdatacenter.net, and the network is listed as a carrier at Mars Datacenter's Istanbul and Ankara facilities — consistent with a hosting/colocation footprint rather than an eyeball network. - The announced prefixes are assembled from several different registries' ranges rather than one contiguous allocation, so the address space is best read as a hosting pool, not a subscriber pool.
Interesting
- The number is held under RIPE legacy status by a company registered only recently as its holder — a pre-RIR AS number that ended up with a modern Turkish operator, so its low value says nothing about the company's age.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Address space
Summary
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| TR | Turkey | 21 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS6205- Registry name
- HizliNet-Teknoloji
- Registrant
- lir-tr-hizli-1-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@hizliodeme.com.tr
- Registered
- 2024-02-27
- Last changed
- 2026-04-08
- Status
- active
Reputation
Classification and threat
Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere