asn.dev

Observed topology

AS60132 ZOREOLE-AS

Upstreams 13 carry this network
Downstreams 5 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 18
Adjacent (IPv6) 14

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS60132: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6461Zayo BandwidthTransitIPv4 IPv6117
AS8218Zayo Infrastructure France SAUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv658
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv650
AS29467LUXNETWORK S.A.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv638
AS21351Canal + Telecom SASMobileIPv423
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv4 IPv68
AS50628Leonix Telecom SASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv66
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv66
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv44
AS20766Association "Gitoyen"UnclassifiedIPv44
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv44
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv62
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv62

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS60132 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS210118Alexandre GirardUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6196
AS213313Cyber Test Systems SASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv697
AS47455Cyber Test Systems SASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv697
AS202945Benjamin ColletUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv634
AS197133MEDIACTIVE SASHostingIPv424

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

32 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS60132 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6461Zayo BandwidthTransitIPv4 IPv6328
AS210118Alexandre GirardUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6196
AS29467LUXNETWORK S.A.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6192
AS202945Benjamin ColletUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6128
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6124
AS8218Zayo Infrastructure France SAUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6104
AS47455Cyber Test Systems SASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv697
AS213313Cyber Test Systems SASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv697
AS197133MEDIACTIVE SASHostingIPv440
AS21351Canal + Telecom SASMobileIPv429
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv4 IPv620
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv618
AS50628Leonix Telecom SASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv616
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv610
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv410
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv49
AS20766Association "Gitoyen"UnclassifiedIPv48
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv66
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv43
AS35661VIRTUA SYSTEMS SASUnclassifiedIPv62
AS20473The Constant Company, LLCHostingIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS60132, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
France-IX ParisParis, France37.49.238.231570

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.