Autonomous system
AS59796 STORMWALL-AS
Unclassified RIPE NSP
Summary
StormWall
transit nsp global
STORMWALL-AS is operated by StormWall s.r.o.
What it's used for
- The address space carries mixed infrastructure, with registrants including StormWall s.r.o., Cloud Host Pte Ltd, ID-NIC HOSTMASTERS, Storm Networks LLC, and StormWall FZC LLC.
- With 3,840 IPv4 addresses and 9 IPv6 prefixes announced against 267 observed neighbours, the high neighbour-to-address ratio indicates a transit or network service provider role.
- As a global Network Service Provider (NSP), the traffic consists of upstream transit, peering, and interconnection for its customer base.
Notable
- Registrants vary across the inventory, including StormWall s.r.o., Cloud Host Pte Ltd, ID-NIC HOSTMASTERS, Storm Networks LLC, and StormWall FZC LLC, reflecting a multi-entity or acquired portfolio.
- The inventory includes prefixes from multiple geographic regions, such as Slovakia, Singapore, Indonesia, Russia, and the UAE, consistent with a global service footprint.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 11 exchanges in 8 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| IX.br (PTT.br) São Paulo | São Paulo, Brazil | 187.16.216.30 |
| DE-CIX Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 80.81.193.45 |
| Neutral Internet Exchange | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 193.239.119.189 |
| Equinix Internet Exchange Singapore | Singapore, Singapore | 27.111.230.94 |
| NetIX | Sofia, Bulgaria | 185.1.226.25 |
| Equinix Internet Exchange Hong Kong | Hong Kong, China | 2001:de8:7::5:9796:2 |
| FL-IX - The Florida Internet Exchange / Community IX - Florida | Miami, United States | 206.41.108.243 |
| Bulgarian Internet eXchange | Sofia, Bulgaria | 193.169.199.92 |
Transit providers
33 upstream, 99 downstream and 168 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 10 prefixes · 3.58K addresses IPv6 9 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| SK | Slovakia | 19 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS59796- Registry name
- STORMWALL-AS
- Registrant
- mnt-sk-stormwall-1
- Abuse contact
- abuse@stormwall.sk
- Registered
- 2014-09-25
- Last changed
- 2026-03-06
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- StormWall
- Also known as
- StormWall
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- Global
- Traffic ratio
- Mostly Inbound
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-STORMWALL-SET- Present at
- 12 exchanges
- Facilities
- 15 facilities
- Website
- https://stormwall.network
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 21 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 50 authorising AS59796
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 21 of 21 announcements
- Route objects
- 75 naming AS59796
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere