Observed topology
AS59105 HOMENOC Home NOC Operators Group
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS59105: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2518 | BIGLOBE Inc. | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 170 |
| AS59103 | SoftEther Corporation | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 48 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 | 45 |
| AS9371 | SAKURA Internet Inc. | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 22 |
| AS9370 | SAKURA Internet Inc. | Hosting | IPv4 | 20 |
| AS7529 | GMO NetIRD, Inc. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 19 |
| AS38855 | Taiwan Digital Streaming Co. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 6 |
| AS17639 | Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 6 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 6 |
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS59105 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS63771 | Border Gateway Protocol Network Analysis Project | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 995 |
| AS209306 | Jin Shaohai | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 171 |
| AS63806 | Human-life Information Platforms Institute | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 164 |
| AS45689 | Convivial Net | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 155 |
| AS63797 | CuteIP | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 106 |
| AS154486 | REI MIMURA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 97 |
| AS38215 | Syuhei Uda | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 75 |
| AS208223 | SHU-HAO TUNG | Unclassified | IPv6 | 74 |
| AS152865 | Tokyo University of Technology Linux Club | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 74 |
| AS63791 | doornoc | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 72 |
| AS152873 | Neodyland | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 66 |
| AS63781 | Kobayashi Family Net LLP | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 54 |
| AS152626 | Cloudbase Network CORP. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 51 |
| AS151371 | PAINA Information Development | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 50 |
| AS59128 | Kyoto University Microcomputer Club | Education | IPv4 IPv6 | 44 |
| AS38656 | Loutres | Unclassified | IPv4 | 40 |
| AS59091 | Kanagawa Institute of Technology | Unclassified | IPv4 | 40 |
| AS45679 | Tatsumi, Tomo | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 39 |
| AS146980 | Tokyo Metropolitan College of Industrial Technology Infomation System Engineering Course | Unclassified | IPv6 | 33 |
| AS12654 | Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 31 |
| AS63774 | Kamoike.net LLP | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 22 |
| AS63790 | CyberAgent, Inc. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 14 |
| AS205603 | Xinyu Wei | Unclassified | IPv6 | 13 |
| AS44324 | MoeDove LLC | Residential | IPv6 | 11 |
| AS12198 | JSMSR Network | Unclassified | IPv6 | 10 |
| AS38649 | The University of Electro-Communications | Unclassified | IPv4 | 4 |
| AS38254 | Internet Technology Laboratory | Unclassified | IPv4 | 2 |
| AS152874 | JONET | Unclassified | IPv4 | 2 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS59105 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2518 | BIGLOBE Inc. | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 2,582 |
| AS63771 | Border Gateway Protocol Network Analysis Project | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 2,127 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 | 275 |
| AS9371 | SAKURA Internet Inc. | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 269 |
| AS9370 | SAKURA Internet Inc. | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 238 |
| AS59103 | SoftEther Corporation | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 218 |
| AS209306 | Jin Shaohai | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 171 |
| AS63806 | Human-life Information Platforms Institute | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 164 |
| AS45689 | Convivial Net | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 155 |
| AS38855 | Taiwan Digital Streaming Co. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 128 |
| AS17639 | Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 124 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 110 |
| AS63797 | CuteIP | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 106 |
| AS154486 | REI MIMURA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 97 |
| AS38215 | Syuhei Uda | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 75 |
| AS208223 | SHU-HAO TUNG | Unclassified | IPv6 | 74 |
| AS152865 | Tokyo University of Technology Linux Club | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 74 |
| AS63791 | doornoc | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 72 |
| AS152873 | Neodyland | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 66 |
| AS63781 | Kobayashi Family Net LLP | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 54 |
| AS152626 | Cloudbase Network CORP. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 51 |
| AS151371 | PAINA Information Development | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 50 |
| AS59128 | Kyoto University Microcomputer Club | Education | IPv4 IPv6 | 44 |
| AS38656 | Loutres | Unclassified | IPv4 | 40 |
| AS59091 | Kanagawa Institute of Technology | Unclassified | IPv4 | 40 |
| AS45679 | Tatsumi, Tomo | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 39 |
| AS146980 | Tokyo Metropolitan College of Industrial Technology Infomation System Engineering Course | Unclassified | IPv6 | 33 |
| AS7529 | GMO NetIRD, Inc. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 33 |
| AS12654 | Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 31 |
| AS63774 | Kamoike.net LLP | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 22 |
| AS63790 | CyberAgent, Inc. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 14 |
| AS205603 | Xinyu Wei | Unclassified | IPv6 | 13 |
| AS12198 | JSMSR Network | Unclassified | IPv6 | 12 |
| AS44324 | MoeDove LLC | Residential | IPv6 | 11 |
| AS38001 | NewMedia Express Pte Ltd | Hosting | IPv4 | 8 |
| AS38649 | The University of Electro-Communications | Unclassified | IPv4 | 4 |
| AS152874 | JONET | Unclassified | IPv4 | 2 |
| AS38254 | Internet Technology Laboratory | Unclassified | IPv4 | 2 |
Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Interconnection
Exchange presence
Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS59105, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 4 exchanges across 2 countries and 1 region.
| Exchange | Location | Their address | Member ports |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPIX Tokyo | Tokyo, Japan | 210.171.225.165 | 259 |
| Student & Technology United Internet Exchanges | Taipei, Taiwan | 103.158.187.190 | 133 |
| Equinix Internet Exchange Tokyo | Tokyo, Japan | 2001:de8:5::5:9105:1 | 124 |
| JPIX Osaka | Osaka, Japan | 103.246.232.165 | 114 |
Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.
Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.
PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.