asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS5606 GTS-BACKBONE GTS Telecom

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 91.90K 114 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 17 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly RO
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

GTS Telecom (Romania)

Romania · AI-generated

transit isp legacy

GTS-BACKBONE is the backbone AS of GTS Telecom SRL, the Romanian operator of the former GTS Central Europe group, headquartered on Strada Izvor in Bucharest. Deutsche Telekom acquired GTS Central Europe in 2014, and GTS Telecom has been part of the Deutsche Telekom group since.

What it's used for

Business-grade connectivity in Romania: IP transit, fibre and cross-border capacity, VPN services and data-centre hosting, delivered over GTS's own network and direct interconnects with tier-1 carriers. Roughly 92,000 IPv4 addresses.

Notable

This is a corporate carrier rather than a consumer ISP — the customer base is companies and institutions, so addresses here generally front business sites and hosted infrastructure. The RIPE object still publishes a 24x7 NOC contact, a small tell of a network run for enterprise SLAs.

Interesting

The Czech side of the same group kept its own registration and number — see [AS5588](https://asn.ipinfo.app/AS5588). Two ASNs, one corporate history, and neither one inherits the other's shape: the Romanian AS is the local backbone, not a branch of the Czech one.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Address space

Summary

Full explorer
CountryNamePrefixes
RORomania131

Registry

Allocation record

via RIPE RDAP
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS5606
Registry name
GTS-BACKBONE
Registrant
AS5606-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@gtstelecom.ro
Registered
2002-06-20
Last changed
2022-05-04
Status
active

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check