asn.dev

Observed topology

AS55967 BAIDU Beijing Baidu Netcom Science and Technology Co., Ltd.

Upstreams 25 carry this network
Downstreams 0 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 25
Adjacent (IPv6) 5

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS55967: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6453TATA COMMUNICATIONS (AMERICA) INCTransitIPv4 IPv61,053
AS2914NTT America, Inc.TransitIPv4 IPv6655
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6304
AS3491PCCW Global (HK) Ltd.TransitIPv4116
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv635
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv630
AS55720Gigabit Hosting Sdn BhdHostingIPv429
AS9304HGC Global Communications LimitedHostingIPv424
AS6762TELECOM ITALIA SPARKLE S.p.A.TransitIPv417
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv416
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv46
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv46
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv44
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv44
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv44
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv44
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv44
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv44
AS3303Swisscom (Schweiz) AGResidentialIPv44
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv44
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv44
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv44
AS38001NewMedia Express Pte LtdHostingIPv42
AS23764CTGNetUnclassifiedIPv41
AS58453China Mobile International LimitedUnclassifiedIPv41

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS55967 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

No downstream observed. This network does not appear to carry transit for anyone.

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

30 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS55967 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6453TATA COMMUNICATIONS (AMERICA) INCTransitIPv4 IPv61,053
AS2914NTT America, Inc.TransitIPv4 IPv6655
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6304
AS3491PCCW Global (HK) Ltd.TransitIPv4116
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv635
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv630
AS55720Gigabit Hosting Sdn BhdHostingIPv429
AS9304HGC Global Communications LimitedHostingIPv424
AS6762TELECOM ITALIA SPARKLE S.p.A.TransitIPv417
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv416
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv46
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv46
AS12779IT.Gate S.p.A.UnclassifiedIPv44
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv44
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv44
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv44
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv44
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv44
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv44
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv44
AS3303Swisscom (Schweiz) AGResidentialIPv44
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv44
AS38001NewMedia Express Pte LtdHostingIPv42
AS23764CTGNetUnclassifiedIPv41
AS58453China Mobile International LimitedUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS55967, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 6 exchanges across 4 countries and 2 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.192.1221,073
Equinix Internet Exchange SingaporeSingapore, Singapore27.111.228.237490
BroadBand Internet eXchange TokyoTokyo, Japan101.203.88.216359
Hong Kong Internet ExchangeHong Kong, China123.255.90.131307
Equinix Internet Exchange Hong KongHong Kong, China2001:de8:7::5:5967:3232
BroadBand Internet eXchange SingaporeSingapore, Singapore103.231.152.87151

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.