asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS5401 ASN-CLUENET

Unclassified RIPE Non-Profit

IPv4 addresses 512 1 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 3 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly DE
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

ClueNet (Daniel Roesen)

Germany · AI-generated

other legacy

ASN-CLUENET is The ClueNet Project, a small non-commercial network

registered to Daniel Roesen in Cologne, Germany.

What it's used for

  • A hobbyist / community network run by a network engineer: a handful of prefixes used for personal and project infrastructure and for hands-on BGP work rather than for selling connectivity.

Notable

  • Tiny footprint — a few hundred IPv4 addresses — which is unusual next to the carriers that surround it in the low-5000s ASN range.
  • Registered to an individual rather than a company, one of the relatively few personal AS numbers in this part of the number space.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Address space

Summary

Full explorer
CountryNamePrefixes
DEGermany4

Registry

Allocation record

via RIPE RDAP
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS5401
Registry name
ASN-CLUENET
Registrant
CLUE-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@cluenet.de
Registered
2001-12-24
Last changed
2022-01-06
Status
active

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
ClueNet
Network type
Non-Profit
Scope
Regional
Traffic ratio
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-CLUENET
Present at
1 exchanges
Facilities
1 facilities
Website
http://www.cluenet.de/

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

Threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check