Autonomous system
AS51043 Aspire Technology Solutions
Unclassified RIPE Cable/DSL/ISP
Summary
Aspire Technology Solutions
msp business uk managed-it
The AS handle ASPIRE01 is held by Aspire Technology Solutions Ltd.
What it's used for
- The address space carries managed IT and cyber security services, evidenced by netnames such as
UK-ASPIRE-19920617andAspireTechnologySolutionsregistered to the NOC. - With 47,616 IPv4 addresses across 20 prefixes and 89 observed neighbours, the network functions as a business access and transit provider for its client base.
- Traffic from this AS consists of office workers, web/API endpoints, and branch backhaul for the over 2,000 customers supported by the organisation's managed IT and cyber security teams.
Notable
- Registrants largely agree with the announcer, with most prefixes registered to
NOC; Aspire Technology Solutions Ltd, though some blocks like109.207.16.0/21are registered toRoke Manor Research Limitedand185.151.226.0/23toIT Systems & Support Limited. - Aspire Technology Solutions acquired Cloud Cover IT, a Glasgow-based MSP, expanding its footprint in the UK managed services market.
- The inventory includes a mix of legacy and modern blocks, with the largest being
159.242.64.0/18and83.98.32.0/19, alongside a single IPv6 prefix2a00:ed40::/32.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 5 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| LINX LON1 | London, United Kingdom | 195.66.226.200 |
| London Network Access Point | London, United Kingdom | 5.57.81.91 |
| LINX Manchester | Manchester, United Kingdom | 195.66.244.89 |
| Leeds Internet Exchange | Leeds, United Kingdom | 91.217.231.47 |
| LINX Scotland | Scotland, United Kingdom | 195.66.246.4 |
Transit providers
22 upstream, 8 downstream and 46 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-14, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 20 prefixes · 47.62K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| GB | United Kingdom | 21 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS51043- Registry name
- ASPIRE01
- Registrant
- MNT-ASPIRETS
- Abuse contact
- abuse@aspirets.com
- Registered
- 2010-05-21
- Last changed
- 2026-08-12
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- Aspire Technology Solutions
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Europe
- Traffic ratio
- Mostly Inbound
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-ASPIRE- Present at
- 7 exchanges
- Facilities
- 7 facilities
- Website
- http://www.aspirets.com/
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 73% valid · 16 valid, 6 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 17 authorising AS51043
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 22 of 22 announcements
- Route objects
- 24 naming AS51043
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere