asn.dev

Observed topology

AS50837 CLOUDSIGMA-AS

Upstreams 23 carry this network
Downstreams 1 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 22
Adjacent (IPv6) 14

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS50837: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6461Zayo BandwidthTransitIPv4 IPv6497
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6441
AS25091IP-Max SAUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6396
AS29684Nour Internet Company for Communications and Information Technology Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4364
AS30815Detecon Al Saudia Co. Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4248
AS15612ServeCentric Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4180
AS50629LWLcom GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6178
AS34224Neterra Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6167
AS13237euNetworks GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4106
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv689
AS8220COLT Technology Services Group LimitedHostingIPv4 IPv680
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv613
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv613
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv4 IPv613
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv69
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv69
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv48
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv48
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv48
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv48
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv63
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv42
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv61

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS50837 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS64462Stephan Roland WolfUnclassifiedIPv4128

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

37 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS50837 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS25091IP-Max SAUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6504
AS6461Zayo BandwidthTransitIPv4 IPv6497
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6441
AS29684Nour Internet Company for Communications and Information Technology Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4364
AS30815Detecon Al Saudia Co. Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4248
AS50629LWLcom GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6186
AS15612ServeCentric Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4180
AS34224Neterra Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6175
AS64462Stephan Roland WolfUnclassifiedIPv4128
AS13237euNetworks GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4106
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6101
AS8220COLT Technology Services Group LimitedHostingIPv4 IPv680
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv4 IPv615
AS1836green.ch AGResidentialIPv4 IPv615
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv615
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv69
AS212024Marc SchmittUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv69
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv48
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv48
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv48
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv48
AS34019Hivane AssociationUnclassifiedIPv44
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv63
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv61

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS50837, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 2 exchanges across 2 countries and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.194.1511,073
SwissIXZurich, Switzerland91.206.52.118253

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.