Autonomous system
AS49600 NEARIP
Hosting RIPE Network Services
Summary
Near IP
transit peering isp
NEARIP is operated by Near IP, S.L.
What it's used for
- The address space carries mixed netnames including
ES-INTERMANAGED-20180912,ASDTCORPORATION,NEARIP, andIPGLOBAL, indicating a portfolio of leased or managed IP blocks rather than a single homogeneous service. - With 1536 IPv4 addresses and 19 IPv6 prefixes announced against 228 observed neighbours, the high neighbour-to-address ratio signals a transit or peering-focused role rather than a large-scale access network.
- As a telecommunications provider specializing in peering, BGP, and transit services, traffic from this AS consists primarily of inter-AS routing and network service delivery for clients.
Notable
- Registrants vary by prefix, with
Invermae Solutions SLholding the largest block andNetworkHeroassociated with others, suggesting a history of acquisitions or managed IP leasing. - The inventory is finely subdivided into five IPv4 prefixes and ten IPv6 prefixes, consistent with a service provider managing distinct customer or service segments.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 18 exchanges in 6 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| DE-CIX Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 80.81.195.72 |
| LINX LON1 | London, United Kingdom | 2001:7f8:4::c1c0:1 |
| AMS-IX Amsterdam | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 80.249.213.173 |
| Neutral Internet Exchange | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 193.239.118.104 |
| The Frys Internet Exchange | Frysian, Netherlands | 2001:7f8:10f::c1c0:61 |
| London Network Access Point | London, United Kingdom | 5.57.82.84 |
| Speed Internet Exchange | Dronten, Netherlands | 185.1.223.54 |
| InterIX Internet Exchange | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 2001:7f8:134::93 |
Transit providers
29 upstream, 34 downstream and 108 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 5 prefixes · 1.54K addresses IPv6 19 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| ES | Spain | 24 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS49600- Registry name
- NEARIP
- Registrant
- lir-es-networkhero-1-MNT
- Abuse contact
- pau.nadeu@nearip.com
- Registered
- 2022-04-25
- Last changed
- 2026-04-28
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- NEAR IP
- Network type
- Network Services
- Scope
- Europe
- Traffic ratio
- Balanced
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-NEARIP- Present at
- 24 exchanges
- Facilities
- 14 facilities
- Website
- https://nearip.com
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 7 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 13 authorising AS49600
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 7 of 7 announcements
- Route objects
- 15 naming AS49600
Reputation
Classification and threat
Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere