Autonomous system
AS49362 DSV
Unclassified ARIN Enterprise
Summary
DSV
logistics enterprise transport corporate
DSV is the autonomous system for DSV A/S, a Danish transport and logistics company.
What it's used for
- The address space carries corporate infrastructure for a global logistics provider, with netnames including
DK-DSVAS,DFDS-NET,DANTRANSPORT, andPAWT-BLOCK-157. - The AS announces 166,912 IPv4 addresses across 19 prefixes and 1 IPv6 prefix, while maintaining 48 observed neighbours; this ratio of moderate address inventory to high peering connectivity indicates a large-scale enterprise network requiring robust transit and peering for global operations.
- Traffic from this AS consists of internal corporate communications, logistics management systems, and operational endpoints supporting DSV's global road, air, sea, and train transport services.
Notable
- All registrants for the largest prefixes are listed as
DSV IP Network; DSV A/S; Abuse-C Role, which aligns directly with the AS holder. - DSV A/S was formerly known as DSV Panalpina A/S following its acquisition of Panalpina, a history reflected in the
PAWT-BLOCK-157netname and PeeringDB records. - The inventory includes a mix of large /16 blocks and smaller /21 to /24 prefixes, with some blocks like
DFDS-NETandDANTRANSPORTsuggesting historical acquisitions or legacy network segments integrated into the current corporate estate.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 4 exchanges in 4 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral Internet Exchange | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 193.239.118.96 |
| NAPAfrica IX Johannesburg | Johannesburg, South Africa | 196.60.9.49 |
| AMS-IX Hong Kong | Hong Kong, China | 103.247.139.82 |
| Megaport Dallas | Dallas, United States | 206.53.174.18 |
Transit providers
18 upstream, 0 downstream and 26 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 19 prefixes · 167K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| DK | Denmark | 20 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- ARIN
- Handle
AS49362- Registry name
- DSV
- Registrant
- DSV-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@dsv.com
- Registered
- 2009-05-26
- Last changed
- 2018-09-04
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- DSV Panalpina
- Network type
- Enterprise
- Scope
- Global
- Traffic ratio
- Mostly Inbound
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
AS-DSV- Present at
- 4 exchanges
- Facilities
- 6 facilities
- Website
- http://www.dsv.com
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 8% valid · 2 valid, 24 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 2 authorising AS49362
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 92% registered · 24 of 26 announcements
- Route objects
- 34 naming AS49362
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere