asn.dev

Observed topology

AS41427 MARC-NET_AS

Hosting RIPE

Upstreams 3 carry this network
Downstreams 1 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 5
Adjacent (IPv6) 3
Upstream graph Who carries AS41427, and who carries them, drawn as a map up to the transit-free core. 1 exchange Where AS41427 physically turns up to peer, and its address on each fabric.

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS41427: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6192
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6134
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv663

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS41427 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS44615PRO PLUS, d.o.o.UnclassifiedIPv412

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

observed

Every AS seen directly next to AS41427 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6194
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6147
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv663
AS44615PRO PLUS, d.o.o.UnclassifiedIPv412
AS9119SOFTNET d.o.o.ResidentialIPv43

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-11 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.47M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.