asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS29226 MASTERTEL-AS Moscow, Russia

Unclassified RIPE NSP

IPv4 addresses 46.59K 43 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 25 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly RU
Exchanges 2 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 29 197 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Mastertel

Russian Federation · AI-generated

isp residential russia regional

MASTERTEL-AS is operated by JSC Mastertel, a regional internet service provider based in Moscow.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries residential and business access traffic, evidenced by reverse DNS entries pointing to in-addr.mastertelecom.ru.
  • With 46,336 IPv4 addresses announced across 42 prefixes and 330 observed neighbours, the high neighbour count relative to the address inventory suggests a role focused on peering and transit exchange rather than pure internal corporate segmentation.

Notable

  • Registrants for all sampled prefixes consistently list "Mastertel Admins" and "JSC Mastertel", confirming alignment between the AS holder and the address space owners.
  • The inventory includes a mix of /19, /20, /21, and /22 blocks, with the largest being 83.69.192.0/19, indicating a substantial but fragmented address estate typical of a growing regional ISP.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 2 exchanges in 2 countries, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
DE-CIX FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany80.81.192.94
MSK-IX MoscowMoscow, Russia195.208.208.179

Transit providers

29 upstream, 197 downstream and 258 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS12389PJSC Rostelecom604
AS9002RETN Limited419
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC228
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleCom191
AS29076Citytelecom LLC161
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG153
AS3216PJSC "Vimpelcom"136
AS57304JSC "RetnNet"130

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 43 prefixes · 46.59K addresses IPv6 25 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
RURussian Federation68

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS29226
Registry name
MASTERTEL-AS
Registrant
MASTERTEL-MNT
Abuse contact
noc@mastertel.ru
Registered
2003-07-03
Last changed
2026-09-18
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
Mastertel
Network type
NSP
Scope
Regional
Traffic ratio
Balanced
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-MASTERTEL RIPE::AS-MASTERTEL6
Present at
5 exchanges
Facilities
11 facilities
Website
http://www.mastertel.ru

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
13% valid · 7 valid, 48 with no ROA
ROAs
17 authorising AS29226
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
98% registered · 54 of 55 announcements 1 other origin
Route objects
81 naming AS29226

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 432 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check