Autonomous system
AS264900 RJNET Telecomunicacoes Ltda ME
Residential RIPE
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 5 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| IX.br (PTT.br) São Paulo | São Paulo, Brazil | 187.16.218.236 |
| IX.br (PTT.br) Fortaleza | Fortaleza, Brazil | 45.68.75.85 |
| IX.br (PTT.br) Porto Alegre | Porto Alegre, Brazil | 177.52.38.15 |
| IX.br (PTT.br) Brasília | Brasília, Brazil | 45.184.144.212 |
| IX.br (PTT.br) Salvador | Salvador, Brazil | 200.219.145.187 |
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-16, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 2 prefixes · 2.05K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| BR | Brazil | 3 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
264900- Registry name
- ASN264900
- Registrant
- RJNET Telecomunicacoes Ltda ME
- Abuse contact
- Rogerio da Silva Neri
- Registered
- 2016-03-29
- Last changed
- 2023-08-02
- Allocation
- allocated
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 10 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 3 authorising AS264900
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 10 of 10 announcements
- Route objects
- 11 naming AS264900
Reputation
Classification and threat
Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,783 prefixes, as published 2026-10-17. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere