Observed topology
AS25248 BLUETONE-AS The Czech Republic
Unclassified RIPE
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS25248: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 | Arelion Sweden AB | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 165 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 106 |
| AS174 | Cogent Communications, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 67 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 7 |
| AS29504 | Freenet Liberec, z.s. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 7 |
| AS31230 | Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava | Unclassified | IPv4 | 5 |
| AS37721 | Virtual Technologies & Solutions | Residential | IPv4 | 5 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS25248 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS206438 | MX-NET Telekomunikace s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 521 |
| AS47110 | Cloud4com s.r.o. | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 315 |
| AS206712 | FELDSAM s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 282 |
| AS204351 | NAM system, a.s. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 114 |
| AS213223 | GasNet, s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 111 |
| AS215704 | NGN CZ s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 99 |
| AS199600 | Virtis s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 94 |
| AS213359 | Jan Korinek | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 94 |
| AS59925 | Seonet Multimedia s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 93 |
| AS39790 | Web4U s.r.o. | Hosting | IPv4 | 90 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS25248 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 | Arelion Sweden AB | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,254 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,126 |
| AS174 | Cogent Communications, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 661 |
| AS206438 | MX-NET Telekomunikace s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 521 |
| AS47110 | Cloud4com s.r.o. | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 318 |
| AS206712 | FELDSAM s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 282 |
| AS25192 | CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 216 |
| AS204351 | NAM system, a.s. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 114 |
| AS213223 | GasNet, s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 111 |
| AS215704 | NGN CZ s.r.o. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 99 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-22 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.12M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.