asn.dev

Observed topology

AS25234 ACTIVE24-AS www.active24.cz

Upstreams 11 carry this network
Downstreams 1 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 11
Adjacent (IPv6) 10

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS25234: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS199803ComSource s.r.o.HostingIPv4147
AS46475Limestone Networks, Inc.HostingIPv4 IPv6130
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv665
AS58003Planeetta Internet OyUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv632
AS29208Quantcom, a.s.UnclassifiedIPv427
AS41528Loopia ABUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv67
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv66
AS29504Freenet Liberec, z.s.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv66
AS51013WebSupport s.r.o.HostingIPv4 IPv65
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv43
AS8218Zayo Infrastructure France SAUnclassifiedIPv43

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS25234 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS39570Loopia ABHostingIPv4 IPv638

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

21 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS25234 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS199803ComSource s.r.o.HostingIPv4 IPv6179
AS46475Limestone Networks, Inc.HostingIPv4 IPv6130
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv665
AS39570Loopia ABHostingIPv4 IPv638
AS29208Quantcom, a.s.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv633
AS58003Planeetta Internet OyUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv632
AS41528Loopia ABUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv67
AS29504Freenet Liberec, z.s.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv66
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv66
AS51013WebSupport s.r.o.HostingIPv4 IPv65
AS8218Zayo Infrastructure France SAUnclassifiedIPv43
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv43

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS25234, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it.

No exchange membership on file. That is not the same as peering nowhere: the dataset records what PCH has collected, and many exchanges publish no participant list at all.

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.