asn.dev

Observed topology

AS214022 VIRTNET

Upstreams 27 carry this network
Downstreams 1 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 13
Adjacent (IPv6) 22

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS214022: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv676
AS400587Ryamer, LLCHostingIPv4 IPv632
AS394177SHIFT HOSTING LLCHostingIPv4 IPv623
AS21700Neptune Networks, LLCUnclassifiedIPv416
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv68
AS41051Openfactory GmbH in LiquidationUnclassifiedIPv68
AS56755Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv66
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv66
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv65
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv65
AS52025ParadoxNetworks LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv65
AS214809Jere Kiitola trading as StocadeUnclassifiedIPv64
AS8772NetAssist LLCUnclassifiedIPv64
AS34872Sarah Rossius trading as Servperso SystemsHostingIPv64
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv64
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv64
AS212895Johannes ErnstUnclassifiedIPv64
AS401753BIXCE IncUnclassifiedIPv64
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv64
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv64
AS208210Sarah Rossius trading as Servperso SystemsUnclassifiedIPv63
AS211509Rudakov IhorUnclassifiedIPv62
AS12859BIT BVHostingIPv41
AS394256Tech Futures Interactive Inc.UnclassifiedIPv41
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv41
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv61
AS50304Blix Solutions ASUnclassifiedIPv41

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS214022 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS208487HASAN CAGRI AKSUUnclassifiedIPv410

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

35 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS214022 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv676
AS400587Ryamer, LLCHostingIPv4 IPv642
AS394177SHIFT HOSTING LLCHostingIPv4 IPv623
AS21700Neptune Networks, LLCUnclassifiedIPv416
AS208487HASAN CAGRI AKSUUnclassifiedIPv410
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv68
AS41051Openfactory GmbH in LiquidationUnclassifiedIPv68
AS56755Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv66
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv66
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv65
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv65
AS52025ParadoxNetworks LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv65
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv64
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv64
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv64
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv64
AS401753BIXCE IncUnclassifiedIPv64
AS34872Sarah Rossius trading as Servperso SystemsHostingIPv64
AS8772NetAssist LLCUnclassifiedIPv64
AS212895Johannes ErnstUnclassifiedIPv64
AS214809Jere Kiitola trading as StocadeUnclassifiedIPv64
AS208210Sarah Rossius trading as Servperso SystemsUnclassifiedIPv63
AS211509Rudakov IhorUnclassifiedIPv62
AS394256Tech Futures Interactive Inc.UnclassifiedIPv41
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv41
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv61
AS12859BIT BVHostingIPv41
AS50304Blix Solutions ASUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS214022, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 12 exchanges across 7 countries and 2 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Neutral Internet ExchangeAmsterdam, Netherlands193.239.119.8665
London Network Access PointLondon, United Kingdom5.57.82.135316
Local Internet Exchange DüsseldorfDüsseldorf, Germany185.1.155.51214
Ontario Internet ExchangeToronto, Canada149.112.50.173198
ERA-IX AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands185.1.240.173193
Securebit Internet Exchange ZurichZurich, Switzerland185.1.135.26156
Nine IXParis, France185.1.14.134149
EuroGIX retiredStrasbourg, France185.1.14.134129
UNMETERED ExchangeVancouver, Canada192.34.27.140128
CH Swiss Internet ExchangeZurich, Switzerland185.1.59.203111
Kansas City Internet ExchangeKansas City, United States206.51.7.16172
Local Internet Exchange NetherlandsMeppel, Netherlands185.1.138.2657

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.