asn.dev

Observed topology

AS213605 PYSIO-NETWORK

Upstreams 18 carry this network
Downstreams 9 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 7
Adjacent (IPv6) 32

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS213605: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6562
AS44324MoeDove LLCResidentialIPv4 IPv6128
AS201944HaoRan LiuUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6127
AS51087Bling Network LtdUnclassifiedIPv641
AS31898Oracle CorporationHostingIPv633
AS18423RAID Networks Co., Ltd.HostingIPv423
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv614
AS38855Taiwan Digital Streaming Co.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv612
AS134823Sky Digital Co., Ltd.ResidentialIPv611
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv64
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv62
AS18041Taiwan Digital Streaming Co.HostingIPv42
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv62
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv62
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv62
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv62
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv62
AS204539Axivora Connect LtdResidentialIPv61

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS213605 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS215956Dennis de Houx trading as All In OneUnclassifiedIPv6101
AS154185Liu HaoRanUnclassifiedIPv671
AS211575Rui FengUnclassifiedIPv639
AS209557GEELINX LTDUnclassifiedIPv638
AS154155Suzhou Yesong Information Technology Co., LtdUnclassifiedIPv638
AS142553Airs Project Private Network MainUnclassifiedIPv638
AS60900Adrian Trifonov trading as Ssmidge TechnologiesUnclassifiedIPv637
AS203309Liangyi MaUnclassifiedIPv633
AS199018Xkrme Network LLCUnclassifiedIPv633

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

39 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS213605 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6835
AS201944HaoRan LiuUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6226
AS44324MoeDove LLCResidentialIPv4 IPv6166
AS215956Dennis de Houx trading as All In OneUnclassifiedIPv6101
AS154185Liu HaoRanUnclassifiedIPv671
AS18423RAID Networks Co., Ltd.HostingIPv4 IPv648
AS51087Bling Network LtdUnclassifiedIPv641
AS211575Rui FengUnclassifiedIPv639
AS154155Suzhou Yesong Information Technology Co., LtdUnclassifiedIPv638
AS209557GEELINX LTDUnclassifiedIPv638
AS142553Airs Project Private Network MainUnclassifiedIPv638
AS60900Adrian Trifonov trading as Ssmidge TechnologiesUnclassifiedIPv637
AS203031AKAERE NETWORKS TECHNOLOGY LTDUnclassifiedIPv635
AS203309Liangyi MaUnclassifiedIPv633
AS199018Xkrme Network LLCUnclassifiedIPv633
AS31898Oracle CorporationHostingIPv633
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv622
AS38855Taiwan Digital Streaming Co.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv620
AS134823Sky Digital Co., Ltd.ResidentialIPv611
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv65
AS7720Skywolf Technology LLCUnclassifiedIPv63
AS204539Axivora Connect LtdResidentialIPv63
AS213241TECHIT.BE SRLResidentialIPv63
AS48362Stadtwerke FeldkirchResidentialIPv62
AS34549meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KGHostingIPv62
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv62
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv62
AS18041Taiwan Digital Streaming Co.HostingIPv42
AS50300CustodianDC LimitedUnclassifiedIPv62
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv62
AS25091IP-Max SAUnclassifiedIPv61
AS1103SURF B.V.UnclassifiedIPv61
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS213605, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 6 exchanges across 5 countries and 3 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
AMS-IX AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands80.249.215.160893
Local Internet Exchange FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany185.1.166.125223
Ontario Internet ExchangeToronto, Canada149.112.50.137198
Taipei Internet Exchange (TPIX)Taipei, Taiwan203.163.223.49151
Student & Technology United Internet ExchangesTaipei, Taiwan103.158.187.170129
Kansas City Internet ExchangeKansas City, United States206.51.7.23172

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.