asn.dev

Observed topology

AS212085 BRUEGGUS-AS Alexander Bruegmann

Upstreams 34 carry this network
Downstreams 0 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 7
Adjacent (IPv6) 34

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS212085: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS44103The Mastermind Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv6211
AS63473HostHatch, LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6148
AS3204xTom OUHostingIPv4 IPv6119
AS37988Alpha Layer Pty LtdUnclassifiedIPv6114
AS53667FranTech SolutionsHostingIPv4 IPv6110
AS40994Hohl IT e.U.HostingIPv4 IPv6109
AS203363Kuroit LimitedUnclassifiedIPv6105
AS51692Steven Smith trading as HyberHostHostingIPv4 IPv6105
AS57695Misaka Network, Inc.UnclassifiedIPv699
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv696
AS56382vServer.site LTDUnclassifiedIPv692
AS60404The Infrastructure Group B.V.UnclassifiedIPv683
AS6517LAKENETWORKSHostingIPv682
AS214677Matteo Martelloni trading as DELUXHOSTHostingIPv678
AS61138Zappie Host LLCUnclassifiedIPv676
AS51519Karabro ABUnclassifiedIPv676
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv674
AS14447Infinitron Internet LLCHostingIPv674
AS152900Onidel Pty LtdUnclassifiedIPv674
AS52025ParadoxNetworks LimitedUnclassifiedIPv674
AS53356Free Range Cloud Hosting Inc.HostingIPv674
AS917Misaka Network, Inc.UnclassifiedIPv670
AS206075Hollander & Jacobsen UG (haftungsbeschraenkt)UnclassifiedIPv668
AS214757Jakub KrsaUnclassifiedIPv656
AS400212VergeTel Group LLCUnclassifiedIPv641
AS209533iFog GmbHUnclassifiedIPv638
AS212073Netureza, Lda.UnclassifiedIPv634
AS215467Skhron OUHostingIPv634
AS207292YANG HAOJINGUnclassifiedIPv625
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv617
AS50131Spartan Host LtdUnclassifiedIPv67
AS401753BIXCE IncUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv67
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv65
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv62

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS212085 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

No downstream observed. This network does not appear to carry transit for anyone.

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

41 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS212085 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS44103The Mastermind Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv6211
AS63473HostHatch, LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6148
AS3204xTom OUHostingIPv4 IPv6119
AS37988Alpha Layer Pty LtdUnclassifiedIPv6114
AS53667FranTech SolutionsHostingIPv4 IPv6110
AS40994Hohl IT e.U.HostingIPv4 IPv6109
AS203363Kuroit LimitedUnclassifiedIPv6105
AS51692Steven Smith trading as HyberHostHostingIPv4 IPv6105
AS57695Misaka Network, Inc.UnclassifiedIPv699
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv696
AS56382vServer.site LTDUnclassifiedIPv692
AS60404The Infrastructure Group B.V.UnclassifiedIPv683
AS6517LAKENETWORKSHostingIPv682
AS214677Matteo Martelloni trading as DELUXHOSTHostingIPv678
AS51519Karabro ABUnclassifiedIPv676
AS61138Zappie Host LLCUnclassifiedIPv676
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv674
AS14447Infinitron Internet LLCHostingIPv674
AS53356Free Range Cloud Hosting Inc.HostingIPv674
AS52025ParadoxNetworks LimitedUnclassifiedIPv674
AS152900Onidel Pty LtdUnclassifiedIPv674
AS917Misaka Network, Inc.UnclassifiedIPv670
AS206075Hollander & Jacobsen UG (haftungsbeschraenkt)UnclassifiedIPv668
AS214757Jakub KrsaUnclassifiedIPv656
AS400212VergeTel Group LLCUnclassifiedIPv641
AS209533iFog GmbHUnclassifiedIPv638
AS212073Netureza, Lda.UnclassifiedIPv634
AS215467Skhron OUHostingIPv634
AS207292YANG HAOJINGUnclassifiedIPv625
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv617
AS50131Spartan Host LtdUnclassifiedIPv67
AS401753BIXCE IncUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv67
AS56662Marcin GondekUnclassifiedIPv65
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv62

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS212085, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 2 exchanges across 2 countries and 2 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Local Internet Exchange DüsseldorfDüsseldorf, Germany185.1.155.125214
Ontario Internet ExchangeToronto, Canada149.112.50.148198

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.