Observed topology
AS210667 SMISHCRAFT Adam Goodenough TA Smishcraft Hosting
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS210667: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 503 |
| AS34927 | iFog GmbH | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 159 |
| AS52025 | ParadoxNetworks Limited | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 110 |
| AS61049 | Exascale Ltd | Residential | IPv4 | 63 |
| AS835 | GoCodeIT Inc | Unclassified | IPv4 | 53 |
| AS36231 | Tempest Hosting, LLC | Hosting | IPv6 | 38 |
| AS208453 | Johan Karlsson trading as SweHosting | Hosting | IPv6 | 38 |
| AS41051 | Openfactory GmbH in Liquidation | Unclassified | IPv6 | 33 |
| AS205794 | JINZE YANG | Unclassified | IPv6 | 12 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 12 |
| AS48185 | team.blue NV | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 12 |
| AS50300 | CustodianDC Limited | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 12 |
| AS3333 | Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) | Unclassified | IPv6 | 4 |
| AS213241 | TECHIT.BE SRL | Residential | IPv6 | 4 |
| AS57463 | NetIX Communications JSC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 4 |
| AS48362 | Stadtwerke Feldkirch | Residential | IPv6 | 4 |
| AS12186 | GVVME | Unclassified | IPv4 | 4 |
| AS34549 | meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | Hosting | IPv6 | 4 |
| AS56662 | Marcin Gondek | Unclassified | IPv6 | 3 |
| AS29632 | Netassist International EOOD | Unclassified | IPv6 | 2 |
| AS50304 | Blix Solutions AS | Unclassified | IPv6 | 2 |
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS210667 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS204375 | Adam Goodenough | Unclassified | IPv6 | 24 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS210667 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 503 |
| AS34927 | iFog GmbH | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 183 |
| AS52025 | ParadoxNetworks Limited | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 110 |
| AS61049 | Exascale Ltd | Residential | IPv4 | 63 |
| AS835 | GoCodeIT Inc | Unclassified | IPv4 | 53 |
| AS36231 | Tempest Hosting, LLC | Hosting | IPv6 | 38 |
| AS208453 | Johan Karlsson trading as SweHosting | Hosting | IPv6 | 38 |
| AS41051 | Openfactory GmbH in Liquidation | Unclassified | IPv6 | 33 |
| AS204375 | Adam Goodenough | Unclassified | IPv6 | 24 |
| AS205794 | JINZE YANG | Unclassified | IPv6 | 12 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 12 |
| AS48185 | team.blue NV | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 12 |
| AS50300 | CustodianDC Limited | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 12 |
| AS213241 | TECHIT.BE SRL | Residential | IPv6 | 4 |
| AS57463 | NetIX Communications JSC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 4 |
| AS48362 | Stadtwerke Feldkirch | Residential | IPv6 | 4 |
| AS34549 | meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | Hosting | IPv6 | 4 |
| AS3333 | Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) | Unclassified | IPv6 | 4 |
| AS12186 | GVVME | Unclassified | IPv4 | 4 |
| AS56662 | Marcin Gondek | Unclassified | IPv6 | 3 |
| AS29632 | Netassist International EOOD | Unclassified | IPv6 | 2 |
| AS50304 | Blix Solutions AS | Unclassified | IPv6 | 2 |
Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Interconnection
Exchange presence
Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS210667, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 8 exchanges across 5 countries and 2 regions.
| Exchange | Location | Their address | Member ports |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMS-IX Amsterdam | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 80.249.212.58 | 894 |
| KleyReX Internet Exchange | Frankfurt, Germany | 193.189.83.241 | 475 |
| London Network Access Point | London, United Kingdom | 5.57.82.120 | 316 |
| Local Internet Exchange Frankfurt | Frankfurt, Germany | 185.1.166.118 | 223 |
| Ontario Internet Exchange | Toronto, Canada | 149.112.50.8 | 198 |
| ERA-IX Amsterdam | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 185.1.240.139 | 193 |
| LayerSwitch Internet Exchange | The Hague, Netherlands | 185.1.32.145 | 105 |
| Kansas City Internet Exchange | Kansas City, United States | 206.51.7.184 | 72 |
Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.
Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.
PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.