asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS203154 MITELIS-DOWNSTREAM MITELIS SECURITY LIMITED

Unclassified Spamhaus ASN-DROP RIPE Content

IPv4 addresses 3.07K 10 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly GB
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 5 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Mitelis Security Limited

United Kingdom · AI-generated

mobile residential byoip uk

The AS handle MITELIS-DOWNSTREAM is held by Mitelis Security Limited.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries customer traffic, evidenced by netnames PLAY2GO-CUSTOMERS-NETWORK and MITELIS-CUSTOMERS-NETWORK across the announced prefixes.
  • The AS announces 3072 IPv4 addresses across 10 prefixes with 7 observed neighbours, a ratio consistent with an access or eyeball network rather than a transit provider.
  • Traffic from this AS consists of subscriber data for mobile and fixed-line customers, specifically serving Play2Go and Mitelis end-users in the United Kingdom.

Notable

  • Registrants include Play2Go International Limited, Play2Go - FZCO, and Mitelis Security Limited, indicating the space supports both the Mitelis brand and its Play2Go subsidiary.
  • The inventory is a mix of /23 and /24 blocks, with the largest being 2.26.4.0/23 and 177.3.210.0/23, both labeled as customer networks.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

5 upstream, 0 downstream and 5 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS49581Ferdinand Zink trading as Tube-Hosting366
AS58212dataforest GmbH122
AS215439PLAY2GO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED118
AS213229MITELIS SECURITY LIMITED61
AS62255BiMajLink d.o.o.60

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-11-03, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 10 prefixes · 3.07K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
GBUnited Kingdom10

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS203154
Registry name
MITELIS-DOWNSTREAM
Registrant
lir-de-dataforest-1-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@mitelis.net
Registered
2025-12-05
Last changed
2026-03-17
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
MITELIS-DOWNSTREAM
Also known as
MITELIS BYOIP
Network type
Content
Scope
Europe
Traffic ratio
Balanced
Peering policy
Open
Website
https://mitelis.net

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 12 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
13 authorising AS203154
ASPA
6 declared providers
IRR
100% registered · 12 of 12 announcements
Route objects
13 naming AS203154

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

On Spamhaus ASN-DROP Spamhaus lists this entire network (associated domain play2go.cloud) as controlled by, or hijacked for, cybercrime. Many operators null-route everything it originates.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 448 networks and 1,851 prefixes, as published 2026-11-04. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check